ArticleEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2026
CEA-targeted fluorescence endoscopy for the detection of high-grade dysplasia and early invasive rectal cancer: A proof-of-concept trial.
Article in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06280690 (SGM-101 Tumor-targeted Fluorescence Endoscopy to Enable Discrimination of Malignant From Benign Tissue in Rectal Polyps With Suspected T1 Adenocarcinoma or High Grade Dysplasia), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
SGM-101 Tumor-targeted Fluorescence Endoscopy to Enable Discrimination of Malignant From Benign Tissue in Rectal Polyps With Suspected T1 Adenocarcinoma or High Grade Dysplasia: a Feasibility Study
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeAccurate recognition of high-grade dysplasia (HGD) and early invasive carcinoma (IC) within colorectal polyps is essential for selecting the preferred local resection technique. However, optical endoscopic diagnosis can be challenging, particularly in large and advanced polyps. This study investigates whether carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA)-targeted near-infrared fluorescence (NIRF) imaging can distinguish polyps containing HGD/IC from polyps solely containing low-grade dysplasia (LGD), given prior evidence of CEA overexpression in HGD/IC relative to LGD.
methodsPatients scheduled for local en-bloc endoscopic resection of advanced rectal polyps were included in the study and received 5 mg or 10 mg intravenous SGM-101, a CEA-targeted fluorescent agent. In vivo imaging was performed using a rigid Quest-Olympus NIRF-endoscope, followed by ex vivo whole-specimen and bread-loaf imaging using the PEARL imaging system. The primary endpoint was the NIRF tumour-to-low-grade-dysplasia ratio (TDR; HGD/IC divided by LGD) performed on bread loafs, as this method enabled direct pathological correlation. Secondary endpoints included dose-finding as well as sensitivity and specificity for detecting HGD/IC.
resultsA total of 22 patients were included, with 9/22 containing LGD only and 13/22 containing HGD/IC. Eleven patients received 10 mg and 11 received 5 mg SGM-101. Ex vivo bread-loaf imaging showed a median (IQR) TDR of 1.7 (1.3-2.9), with higher values in the 10 mg group of 2.5 (2.0-3.5) compared to the 1.3 (1.2-1.6) in the 5 mg group (p = 0.023). The sensitivity for detecting HGD/IC was 86% (2 false-negatives), and specificity was 88% (1 false-positive).
conclusionAlthough with limited sample size, this study demonstrates proof-of-concept of CEA-targeted NIRF-imaging in differentiating HGD/IC bearing polyps from completely benign LGD polyps. Clinical utility, including its impact on treatment decision-making and patient outcomes, remains to be demonstrated in future, larger prospective studies. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT06280690.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42690333What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.