ArticleArquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery2026
Clinicopathologic features and prognostic factors in early- versus late-onset colorectal cancer: a stage-stratified retrospective surgical cohort from the Mekong Delta, Vietnam.
Article in Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEarly-onset colorectal cancer (EOCRC), defined as diagnosis before 50 years of age, has increased in incidence globally, but its clinicopathologic profile and prognostic significance remain incompletely characterized, particularly in Southeast Asian populations with limited access to organized screening.
aimsTo compare clinicopathologic characteristics and survival outcomes between EOCRC and late-onset colorectal cancer (LOCRC) following curative resection, and to identify independent prognostic determinants in a regional Vietnamese surgical cohort.
methodsThis retrospective cohort study included 486 patients with stage I-III colorectal adenocarcinoma who underwent curative laparoscopic resection at a tertiary center in the Mekong Delta between 2016 and 2022.
resultsEOCRC (184 patients, 37.9%) was associated with higher rates of poor differentiation, mucinous or signet-ring cell histology, lymphovascular invasion, and perineural invasion compared with LOCRC (all p<0.05). Overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and recurrence-free survival (RFS) did not differ significantly between groups. In the overall cohort (log-rank p=0.72, 0.15, and 0.96, respectively). On multivariable analysis, postoperative complications were the dominant independent prognostic factor for OS (hazard ratio [HZ] 8.28; 95% confidence interval [CI] 4.87-14.09) and RFS (HZ 4.81; 95%CI 3.03-7.65), whereas age at onset was not independently associated with either outcome. Stage-stratified curves suggested a less favorable survival pattern among patients with stage III EOCRC, particularly for CSS and RFS.
conclusionsDespite a more aggressive histopathologic profile, EOCRC showed comparable survival to LOCRC in the overall cohort. Stage-stratified curves suggested a less favorable survival pattern among patients with stage III EOCRC, while postoperative complications represented the dominant modifiable determinant of outcome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.