ReviewJournal of assisted reproduction and genetics2026
Effects of assisted reproductive techniques on offspring cardiovascular health: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Review in Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Assisted reproductive techniques (ART) are increasingly used worldwide. Concerns persist regarding the long-term cardiovascular health of ART-conceived offspring. To systematically review and meta-analyze cardiovascular, vascular, and echocardiographic outcomes in ART-conceived offspring compared with naturally conceived children. PubMed and Scopus were searched from database inception to January 2025. Reference lists of eligible articles were manually screened. Searches included terms related to assisted reproductive technologies, offspring, and cardiovascular outcomes. Only human studies published in English were included. Observational cohort, cross-sectional, and case-control studies evaluating cardiovascular outcomes in ART-conceived offspring with a naturally conceived comparison group were eligible. Studies without relevant outcomes, lacking a control group, or including populations with genetic conditions affecting cardiovascular health were excluded. Two reviewers independently screened studies, with disagreements resolved by a third investigator. Eighty-one studies met inclusion criteria. Data extraction was independently performed by two reviewers following PRISMA and MOOSE guidelines. Risk of bias and study quality were assessed using the Cambridge Quality Checklist. Meta-analyses were conducted using fixed- or random-effects models according to heterogeneity (I
Indexed as
Identifiers
42690289What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.