Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42690257›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of legal medicine2026

Thermal alteration of skeletal remains in forensic anthropology: a systematic review.

Nimet Cevahiroglu, Arda Buyuksungur

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of legal medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Nimet CevahirogluInstitute of Forensic Sciences, Department of Forensic Anthropology, Ankara University, Ankara, Türkiye.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-6702-8941
Arda BuyuksungurFaculty of Dentistry, Department of Basic Medical Sciences, Ankara University, Ankara, Türkiye. abuyuksungur@ankara.edu.tr.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1978-2888

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Heat-induced deaths create complex challenges in forensic anthropology because thermal exposure causes significant structural and chemical changes in skeletal remains. This systematic review aims to examine heat-induced alterations in human bone and evaluate their importance for forensic anthropological examination in heat-induced contexts. A systematic literature search was conducted with PRISMA guidelines using keywords related to burned bone, forensic anthropology, and fire exposure. Studies focusing on thermally altered human skeletal remains were included, while studies involving animals or archaeological material were excluded. This systematic review shows that thermal exposure produces predictable macroscopic and microscopic changes in bone, including progressive color change, shrinkage, warping, and fracture formation. These changes are influenced not only by temperature but also by oxygen availability, combustion duration, and burning conditions. The findings indicate that the effects of thermal alteration vary according to the component of the biological profile. being assessed, the methods employed, and the degree of skeletal preservation. Trauma examination in burned samples remains possible in some cases, although fragmentation and calcination may obscure diagnostic features. Understanding the mechanisms of heat-induced skeletal alteration improves the examination of burned human remains and supports more reliable forensic anthropological analysis in fire-related investigations.

Indexed as

Biological profile estimationBurned boneCalcinationForensic anthropologyHeat-induced bone changesSkeletal remainsThermal exposureTrauma examination

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.