ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2026
Temperature-comfort discordance and an expert-informed perioperative thermal-management framework in robotic urologic surgery: a sequential multimethod study.
Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Core temperature is central to perioperative hypothermia (PH) prevention, but normothermia may not ensure thermal comfort. We examined temperature-comfort discordance, quantified PH burden, and developed an expert-informed management framework for robotic urologic surgery. This sequential multimethod study comprised three complementary stages. Stage I examined paired temperature-Cold Discomfort Scale states across four post-anesthesia care unit assessments in an 80-patient nonconcurrent controlled cohort. Stage II characterized PH burden and associated factors at 10 peri-anesthetic time points in an independent retrospective cohort of 1,214 patients. Stage III used two-round multidisciplinary consultation with 21 experts to develop the framework. Persistent normothermia-cold-discomfort discordance occurred in 38/40 control-period patients (95.0%) and 27/40 intervention-period patients (67.5%; risk difference, - 27.5% points; 95% CI, - 43.4 to - 10.6; P = 0.003). At post-anesthesia care unit discharge, all 80 patients were normothermic, but 12 (15.0%) reported marked cold discomfort. In Stage II, 507/1,214 patients (41.8%) experienced PH at least once and 360 (29.7%) at two or more time points. Higher pre-anesthesia and ward-measured preoperative patient temperatures were associated with lower PH burden and higher minimum temperature. Higher BMI was associated with higher minimum temperature, whereas total intravenous anesthesia was associated with persistent PH and lower minimum temperature. These directions were unchanged after excluding anesthesia-start temperature and restricting analyses to anesthesia-active measurements. Consultation yielded 18 endorsed actions across five domains. Normothermia and thermal comfort may recover asynchronously, while objective PH remains clinically relevant. Joint consideration of core temperature, patient-reported cold discomfort, and clinical context warrants prospective multicenter evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42690240What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.