Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42690213›Full record

ArticleJournal of vision2026

Color as a gate to verification: Super-additive costs in oculomotor disengagement.

Maximilian Stefani, Christina Saalwirth

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of vision, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Maximilian StefaniInstitute of Psychology, Universität der Bundeswehr München, Neubiberg, Germany.
Christina SaalwirthInstitute of Psychology, Universität der Bundeswehr München, Neubiberg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Visual search theories distinguish between attentional capture and disengagement, yet how multiple feature dimensions combine to delay disengagement remains unclear. This study investigated whether shared features (color, shape, object category) produce additive or super-additive costs in oculomotor disengagement. Forty-three participants performed a delayed-disengagement task where a central fixated stimulus shared zero to three features with a peripheral target. Saccadic latency (SL) served as the index of disengagement cost. Results showed that SL increased nonlinearly with the number of shared features, following a quadratic trend. A component decomposition revealed that this acceleration was driven primarily by color: Color overlap produced large main effects, whereas shape and object-category overlap produced costs primarily when combined with color. Our findings suggest that disengagement is not a simple summation of feature similarities. Instead, color may act as a high-priority gate: A color match may open a capacity-limited verification stage in which each additional shared feature disproportionately prolongs inspection. We interpret these findings in terms of a candidate hierarchical gating account, in which high-salience features such as color may govern entry into verification.

Indexed as

AttentionColor PerceptionForm PerceptionSaccadesAdultFemaleHumansMalePattern Recognition, VisualPhotic StimulationReaction TimeYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID42690213
PMCPMC13557186

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.