Trial reportEuropace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology2026
Edoxaban antithrombotic therapy in diabetic patients with atrial fibrillation and stable coronary artery disease: the EPIC-CAD trial.
Trial report in Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03718559 (A Multi-centre, Open-labelled, Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Two Different Anticoagulation Strategies in High-risk Atrial Fibrillation and Stable Coronary Artery Disease), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Multi-centre, Open-labelled, Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Two Different Anticoagulation Strategies in High-risk Atrial Fibrillation and Stable Coronary Artery Disease
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
30 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimsThe appropriate antithrombotic regimen for diabetic patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and stable coronary artery disease (CAD) who are at high atherothrombotic risk remains uncertain. We evaluated whether the effects of different antithrombotic strategies differ according to diabetes status. METHODS AND
resultsThe EPIC-CAD (Edoxaban versus Edoxaban with Antiplatelet Agent in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation and Chronic Stable Coronary Artery Disease) was a randomized trial comparing edoxaban monotherapy with dual antithrombotic therapy (edoxaban plus a single antiplatelet agent) in patients with AF and stable CAD. The primary outcome was a composite of death from any cause, myocardial infarction, stroke, systemic embolism, unplanned urgent revascularization, and major or clinically relevant non-major bleeding at 12 months. Among 1040 randomized patients, 421 (40.5%) had diabetes. There were no differences in the incidence of the primary outcome between diabetic and non-diabetic patients [9.7% vs. 11.6%; hazard ratio (HR) 0.82; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.56-1.20; P = 0.30]. The incidence of the primary outcome at 12 months was significantly lower with edoxaban monotherapy than with dual antithrombotic therapy in both diabetic (6.3% vs. 13.7%; HR 0.44; 95% CI 0.23-0.83; P = 0.01) and non-diabetic patients (6.7% vs. 16.3%; HR 0.39; 95% CI 0.23-0.65; P < 0.001), with no significant interaction between diabetic status and randomized treatment strategy (P for interaction = 0.78).
conclusionThe risk of primary outcome was similar between diabetic and non-diabetic patients with AF and CAD. Irrespective of diabetes status, edoxaban monotherapy led to a lower risk of a primary outcome at 12 months than dual antithrombotic therapy. CLINICAL
trial registrationEPIC-CAD ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT03718559.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.