Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42690083›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of chemical physics2026

Deep learning of position-dependent diffusivity from umbrella sampling molecular dynamics simulations.

Jonathan Harris, Benoît Roux

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of chemical physics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jonathan HarrisDepartment of Chemistry, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7475-0061
Benoît RouxDepartment of Chemistry, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5254-2712

Funding

Molecular dynamics studies of K+ and Na+ channels and biomembranes based on a polarizable force fieldR35GM152124 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI BENOIT ROUX · 2024 to 2026
$2.2M
Beagle-3: A Shared GPU Cluster for Biomolecular SciencesS10OD028655 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI ROUX, BENOIT · 2020 to 2020
$2.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM152124NIH HHS S10 OD028655
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A widely used computational framework to calculate the membrane permeability coefficient of small molecules is the inhomogeneous solubility-diffusion (ISD) model. It requires two ingredients that can be calculated using molecular dynamics simulations: the potential of mean force, which is well-defined, and the position-dependent diffusivity, which is often problematic and challenging. Two methods (Woolf-Roux and Hummer) have been proposed to determine the position-dependent diffusivity profiles using biased umbrella sampling simulations. While both are constructed from similar time-correlation functions, they can disagree quantitatively. Here, a reconciliation of these methods is achieved through deep learning memory functions in the time domain. The diffusivity extracted through this analysis is shown to be in best agreement with the equilibrium counting permeability for the same membrane system compared to both the Woolf-Roux and Hummer diffusivities. The effect of memory on the rate of barrier crossing is assessed through numerical simulations of the generalized Langevin equation (GLE). The GLE is efficiently simulated via Markovian embedding, which relies on the positive, decaying exponential form of the memory functions extracted by deep learning. Our results based on the ISD permeability, the known permeability from equilibrium molecular dynamics, and the numerical GLE simulations indicate that memory effects most likely do not have a significant effect on the permeation of water.

Identifiers

PMID42690083
PMCPMC13633579

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.