Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42690034›Full record

ArticleMicrobiology spectrum2026

Cell recovery and DNA extraction methods skew relative abundance estimations of foodborne pathogens and spoilage organisms on stainless steel surfaces.

Jingzhang Feng, Sarah E Daly, Katerina Roth, Abigail B Snyder

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbiology spectrum, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jingzhang FengDepartment of Food Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2738-824X
Sarah E DalyDepartment of Food Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6515-7426
Katerina RothDepartment of Food Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0333-0809
Abigail B SnyderDepartment of Food Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1141-4746

Funding

National Institute of Food and Agriculture 2022-67017-36289
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Amplicon sequencing investigations of surface microbiota in food facilities often report the relative abundance of bacteria and fungi. However, physiological differences among cell types can result in variable cell recovery and DNA yields, thereby skewing relative abundance estimates. Here, we evaluated (i) variations in cell recovery among different bacterial and fungal species after surface swabbing and (ii) the impact of DNA extraction protocols on relative abundance estimates from artificially inoculated stainless steel surfaces. Our results showed that IMPORTANCE: Amplicon sequencing has been used to characterize microbial communities on facility surfaces. However, few studies have evaluated the accuracy of the amplicon sequencing workflow for quantifying spoilage and pathogenic organisms in these microbial communities. Here, we assessed the accuracy of amplicon sequencing to evaluate the relative abundance of spoilage and pathogenic organisms commonly found in food-processing environments. The results revealed biases in relative abundances due to limitations in cell recovery and DNA extraction methods. These findings revealed the potential biases in surface microbiota characterization in food facilities and the need to refine current recovery and extraction methods to enhance the accuracy of microbiota characterization.

Indexed as

BacteriaDNA, BacterialDNA, FungalFood MicrobiologyFungiStainless SteelFoodborne DiseasesMicrobiotaDNA, BacterialDNA, FungalStainless Steelamplicon sequencingDNA extractionfood processing environmentsmicrobiota characterization

Identifiers

PMID42690034
PMCPMC13688833

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.