Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42689737›Full record

ArticleRevista de neurologia2026

[XVIII Post-ECTRIMS Meeting: Review of the New Developments Presented at the 2025 ECTRIMS Congress (Part II)].

Óscar Fernández, Xavier Montalban, Adrián Arés, Eduardo Agüera, Yolanda Aladro, Ana Alonso, Rafael Arroyo, Luis Brieva, Carmen Calles, Ana Belén Caminero and 15 more

Abstract readConference ProceedingsEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Revista de neurologia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors.

Óscar FernándezDepartamento de Farmacología, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Málaga, 29016 Málaga, España.
Xavier MontalbanCentro de Esclerosis Múltiple de Cataluña y Departamento de Neurología, Hospital Universitario Vall d'Hebron, 08035 Barcelona, España.
Adrián ArésServicio de Neurología, Complejo Asistencial Universitario de León, 24008 León, España.
Eduardo AgüeraServicio de Neurología, Hospital Reina Sofía, 14004 Córdoba, España.
Yolanda AladroServicio de Neurología, Hospital Universitario de Getafe, 28905 Getafe, España.
Ana AlonsoUnidad de Esclerosis Múltiple, Servicio de Neurología, Hospital Regional Universitario de Málaga, 29010 Málaga, España.
Rafael ArroyoServicio de Neurología, Hospital Universitario Quirónsalud, 28223 Pozuelo de Alarcón, España.
Luis BrievaUniversitat de Lleida, 25198 Lleida, España.
Carmen CallesServicio de Neurología, Hospital Universitario Son Espases, 07120 Palma de Mallorca, España.
Ana Belén CamineroServicio de Neurología, Complejo Asistencial de Ávila, 05071 Ávila, España.
Tamara Castillo-TriviñoServicio de Neurología, Hospital Universitario Donostia, Grupo de Neuroinmunología, IIS Biogipuzkoa, 20014 Donostia, España.
Lucienne Costa-FrossardCSUR de Esclerosis Múltiple, Hospital Ramón y Cajal, 28034 Madrid, España.
Sara EichauServicio de Neurología, Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena, 41009 Sevilla, España.
Lamberto LandeteServicio de Neurología, Hospital Universitario Doctor Peset, 46017 Valencia, España.
Miguel LlanezaServicio de Neurología, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, 33011 Oviedo, España.
Sara LlufriuUnidad de Neuroinmunología y Esclerosis Múltiple, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona e IDIBAPS, 08036 Barcelona, España.
José E Meca-LallanaCSUR Esclerosis Múltiple, Unidad de Neuroinmunología Clínica, Servicio de Neurología, Hospital Clínico Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca (IMIB-Arrixaca), 30120 El Palmar, España.
Virginia Meca-LallanaServicio de Neurología, Hospital Universitario de la Princesa, 28006 Madrid, España.
Enric MonrealCSUR de Esclerosis Múltiple, Hospital Ramón y Cajal, 28034 Madrid, España.
Ester MoralServicio de Neurología, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario Moisès Broggi, 08970 Barcelona, España.
Celia Oreja-GuevaraServicio de Neurología, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria San Carlos (IdISSC), 28040 Madrid, España.
José María PrietoServicio de Neurología, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Santiago de Compostela (IDIS), 15706 Santiago de Compostela, España.
Lucía Romero-PinelHospital Universitari de Bellvitge-Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL), 08908 L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, España.
Àlex RoviraSección de Neuroradiología, Departamento de Radiología, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, 08035 Barcelona, España.
Alfredo Rodríguez-AntigüedadServicio de Neurología, Hospital Universitario Cruces, 48903 Barakaldo, España.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The 18th edition of the post-European Committee for Treatment and Research in Multiple Sclerosis (ECTRIMS) meeting was held on 17-18 October 2025 in Madrid, bringing together Spanish neurologists specialising in multiple sclerosis (MS), who presented the most relevant advances discussed at the ECTRIMS congress held a few days earlier in Barcelona. The aim of this edition was to present the latest developments in MS regarding the update of diagnostic criteria, advanced neuroimaging techniques, the role of Epstein-Barr virus, remyelination mechanisms and biomarkers. In the therapeutic field, emerging treatments were addressed, such as new monoclonal antibodies and chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CAR-T), the management of elderly patients and the risks associated with high-efficacy therapies. This article is the second of a two-part series (I and II). The article reviews recent data on disease progression and on the concept of progression independent of relapse activity (PIRA), including the definition, among those published, that leads to balanced incidence and persistence in PIRA rates. Certain neuropathological and imaging aspects are reviewed, and, with regard to serum biomarkers, it is emphasised that neurofilament light chain (NfL) is a marker of acute damage that is not specific to MS, and that the challenge lies in establishing a value that differentiates it from other diseases. It is also discussed whether the low sensitivity of NfL for predicting progression lies in the z-score used in clinical practice, and the usefulness of glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) in combination with NfL to refine the assessment of chronic progressive damage. The importance of age in MS is indisputable. The elderly patient with MS has a greater number of comorbidities and is more vulnerable to certain treatments. Menopause is a normal but expected physiological transition of female ageing that may trigger or aggravate certain health problems, and whose symptoms should not be confused with worsening of the disease. As for cognitive impairment in MS, the latest developments and expert opinions that could help improve its identification and monitoring are summarised. Much of this part II article focuses on summarising the key advances in emerging therapies and treatment prospects in related diseases, without overlooking the risks associated with very high-efficacy therapies and the possible risk-prevention strategies. Finally, as important findings that translate into clinical practice, the notable improvement in diagnosis with the new 2024 McDonald criteria stands out, despite the barriers to accessing paraclinical tests in certain populations. Overall, the data reviewed, together with those gathered in part I, reflect the research effort to advance the understanding of the disease from multiple complementary perspectives, which is transforming the care of patients with MS.

Indexed as

Multiple SclerosisBiomarkersDisease ProgressionHumansBiomarkersECTRIMSmultiple sclerosispost-ECTRIMS

Identifiers

PMID42689737
PMCPMC13541424

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.