ArticleRevista de neurologia2026
[XVIII Post-ECTRIMS Meeting: Review of the New Developments Presented at the 2025 ECTRIMS Congress (Part II)].
Article in Revista de neurologia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
25 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The 18th edition of the post-European Committee for Treatment and Research in Multiple Sclerosis (ECTRIMS) meeting was held on 17-18 October 2025 in Madrid, bringing together Spanish neurologists specialising in multiple sclerosis (MS), who presented the most relevant advances discussed at the ECTRIMS congress held a few days earlier in Barcelona. The aim of this edition was to present the latest developments in MS regarding the update of diagnostic criteria, advanced neuroimaging techniques, the role of Epstein-Barr virus, remyelination mechanisms and biomarkers. In the therapeutic field, emerging treatments were addressed, such as new monoclonal antibodies and chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CAR-T), the management of elderly patients and the risks associated with high-efficacy therapies. This article is the second of a two-part series (I and II). The article reviews recent data on disease progression and on the concept of progression independent of relapse activity (PIRA), including the definition, among those published, that leads to balanced incidence and persistence in PIRA rates. Certain neuropathological and imaging aspects are reviewed, and, with regard to serum biomarkers, it is emphasised that neurofilament light chain (NfL) is a marker of acute damage that is not specific to MS, and that the challenge lies in establishing a value that differentiates it from other diseases. It is also discussed whether the low sensitivity of NfL for predicting progression lies in the z-score used in clinical practice, and the usefulness of glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) in combination with NfL to refine the assessment of chronic progressive damage. The importance of age in MS is indisputable. The elderly patient with MS has a greater number of comorbidities and is more vulnerable to certain treatments. Menopause is a normal but expected physiological transition of female ageing that may trigger or aggravate certain health problems, and whose symptoms should not be confused with worsening of the disease. As for cognitive impairment in MS, the latest developments and expert opinions that could help improve its identification and monitoring are summarised. Much of this part II article focuses on summarising the key advances in emerging therapies and treatment prospects in related diseases, without overlooking the risks associated with very high-efficacy therapies and the possible risk-prevention strategies. Finally, as important findings that translate into clinical practice, the notable improvement in diagnosis with the new 2024 McDonald criteria stands out, despite the barriers to accessing paraclinical tests in certain populations. Overall, the data reviewed, together with those gathered in part I, reflect the research effort to advance the understanding of the disease from multiple complementary perspectives, which is transforming the care of patients with MS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.