Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42689543›Full record

ArticleeLife2026

Sensitivity of the human temporal voice areas to nonhuman primate vocalizations.

Leonardo Ceravolo, Coralie Debracque, Thibaud Gruber, Didier Grandjean

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Leonardo Ceravolo *University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0638-3981
Coralie Debracque *University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Thibaud Gruber *University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Didier Grandjean *University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.

Funding

National Centre of Competence in Research (NCCR) 51NF40-104897Swiss National Science Foundation CR13I1_162720Swiss National Science Foundation PCEFP1_186832
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, research on voice processing in the human brain, particularly the study of temporal voice areas (TVAs), was dedicated almost exclusively to conspecific vocalizations. To characterize commonalities and differences regarding primate vocalization representations in the human brain, the inclusion of closely related nonhuman primates, namely chimpanzees and bonobos, is needed. We hypothesized that neural commonalities would depend on both phylogenetic and acoustic proximities, with chimpanzees ranking closest to Homo. Presenting human participants (

Indexed as

Auditory PerceptionTemporal LobeVocalization, AnimalVoiceAdultAnimalsFemaleHumansMacaca mulattaMalePan paniscusPan troglodytesacousticshumanneurosciencenonhuman primate callsphylogenytemporal voice areas

Identifiers

PMID42689543
PMCPMC13541300

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.