ArticleJournal of Korean gerontological nursing2026
Effects of web-based palliative wound care education using the clinical judgment model: A quasi-experimental study with facilitylevel random allocation.
Article in Journal of Korean gerontological nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeNursing homes face a growing demand for high-quality palliative wound care. Nursing home staff require not only knowledge but also clinical judgment to address the complex needs of residents at the end of life. This study aimed to develop and evaluate a web-based palliative wound care education program using a clinical judgment model.
methodsAn educational program was developed using the ADDIE model through needs analysis with 10 nursing home staff, program design and development, and pilot implementation and evaluation. Program effectiveness was evaluated in a quasi-experimental study with facility-level random allocation. Four nursing homes were randomly allocated to the experimental or control condition, and 52 nursing home staff were included in the final analysis (n=26 per group). The experimental group received clinical judgment model-based web education, whereas the control group received general web-based palliative wound care education without the clinical judgment model. Clinical judgment was assessed before and after the intervention using nonparametric tests.
resultsBoth groups showed significant improvements in clinical judgment. However, the experimental group demonstrated greater improvements than the control group in noticing (Z=-3.91, p<.001), interpreting (Z=-3.39, p=.001), responding (Z=-3.64, p<.001), reflecting (Z=-2.30, p=.021), and the total clinical judgment score (Z=-4.62, p<.001).
conclusionThe findings support the effectiveness of clinical judgment model-based education in improving clinical judgment in palliative wound care. This web-based approach supports continuing education and improves care quality in nursing homes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.