Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42689395›Full record

ArticleBiometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift2026

Penalized Likelihood-Based Estimation of Stratified Semiparametric Cox Models Under Partly Interval Censoring.

Jun Ma, Annabel Webb, Maurizio Manuguerra, H Malcolm Hudson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jun MaSchool of Mathematical and Physical Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4551-203X
Annabel WebbSchool of Mathematical and Physical Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.
Maurizio ManuguerraSchool of Mathematical and Physical Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8780-5551
H Malcolm HudsonSchool of Mathematical and Physical Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4209-6915

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In survival data analysis, the stratified Cox model becomes a popular option when the proportional hazards assumption of the conventional Cox model does not hold for certain covariates. For a stratified Cox model, when the observed survival times contain only right censoring, the method of maximum partial likelihood can still be implemented. However, if survival times include interval-censored observations, the method of maximum partial likelihood is not viable, and the partial likelihood approach cannot be applied. Furthermore, partial likelihood analysis does not supply a smooth estimate of the baseline hazard. In this paper, we consider the stratified Cox model under partly interval-censored survival times. We present a penalized likelihood method for estimating the model parameters, including the baseline hazards. Penalty functions are used to produce smoothed baseline hazards estimates, and also to relax the requirement on optimal number and location of the knots used in the baseline hazards estimates. We also derive a large sample normality result for the estimates, which can be used to make inferences on quantities of interest, such as survival probabilities, without relying on computing-intensive resampling methods.

Indexed as

BiometryHumansLikelihood FunctionsProportional Hazards Modelspartly interval censoringpenalized likelihoodsmoothing parameterstratified semiparametric cox

Identifiers

PMID42689395
PMCPMC13539478

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.