ReviewInternational journal of nanomedicine2026
Engineered Nanozymes for Colorectal Cancer Therapy: Catalytic Reprogramming of the Tumor Microenvironment.
Review in International journal of nanomedicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) remains difficult to treat because redox adaptation, metabolic plasticity, mucin-associated delivery barriers, immune exclusion, and microbiota-dependent signaling jointly limit conventional therapy. Engineered nanozymes provide a reaction-centered strategy for exploiting these CRC-specific vulnerabilities. This review critically compares metal, metal-oxide, carbon-based, porous-framework, and single-atom nanozymes with respect to catalytic mechanism, enzyme-mimicking activity, substrate dependence, controllability, biosafety, and translational suitability. We examine how acidity, hydrogen peroxide, hypoxia, glutathione enrichment, metabolic dysregulation, mucin barriers, and the gut microbiota influence catalytic performance. We further evaluate evidence for chemotherapy sensitization, chemodynamic, photothermal, photodynamic, sonodynamic, immunotherapeutic, and multimodal treatment, emphasizing both mechanistic synergy and limitations of the available preclinical models. Major translational barriers include non-standardized catalytic assays, heterogeneous intratumoral substrates, off-target reactive oxygen species toxicity, uncertain degradation and long-term fate, microbiome disruption, manufacturing reproducibility, and limited validation in orthotopic, immunocompetent, organoid, and patient-derived systems. We therefore position CRC nanozyme therapy as a disease-oriented catalytic medicine platform whose clinical value will depend on biomarker-guided selection, programmable activation, and degradable, locally controllable designs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.