ReviewIndian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine
Policy Silences and the Case for Dedicated Legislation for Street Sweepers in India: Policy Content Analysis using the READ Approach.
Review in Indian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Street sweepers play a vital role in sanitation through solid waste management. They are exposed to a number of occupational hazards, including dust, infectious agents, ergonomics-related disorders, and injuries. Street sweepers are identified as sanitary workers and also municipal solid waste management workers, resulting in fragmentation of guidelines, manuals and legislations governing street sweepers. This necessitates a comprehensive review of existing policy, legal and implementation guidelines, which might apply to street sweepers in India. Content analysis of both policy and nonpolicy documents following the READ approach was done. Thrust areas related to health and safety measures were identified through thematic extraction of health and safety recommendations from the systematic reviews. The document search resulted in one key occupational health policy, four legal documents and nine implementation documents. The policy document analysis identified three key thematic areas, including Enforcement and Compliance, Standards and Awareness and Research, and Monitoring and Evaluation. It was found that there is no separate legislation governing the occupational health of street sweepers. The standards for equipment used, manuals, and job rotation are still in formative stages. There are no fixed medical criteria for joining and continuing as street sweepers. The thematic area research, monitoring, and evaluation was poorly represented. Street sweepers require separate legislation to govern their occupational health and safety. Appropriate standards for equipment, medical criteria for sweepers and regular monitoring should be set up. Researches should be carried out to explore the health risk of sweepers, especially ergonomic and respiratory-related illness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.