ArticleOxford open neuroscience2026
Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) via the Fp3-Fp2 montage disrupts face recognition skills.
Article in Oxford open neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Over the past fifteen years, transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been used to modulate face recognition skills. One influential line of work has shown that anodal stimulation delivered with the anode at Fp3, a site overlying the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), and the return/cathode at Fp2 reduces the face inversion effect (FIE) by selectively disrupting recognition of upright faces, an effect interpreted as the disruption of perceptual learning. A recurring limitation is that the behavioural paradigms employed have relied on stimulus recognition rather than face identity recognition, because the same images were shown at study and test. It therefore remains unclear whether this procedure modulates face identity recognition or merely image-level recognition. Here we addressed this by applying the tDCS procedure during upright and inverted versions of the Cambridge Face Memory Test (CFMT), a robust identity-recognition paradigm in which learned identities must be recognised across novel images varying in viewpoint, lighting, and noise. Participants (N = 64) were randomly assigned in a double-blind, between-subjects design to anodal or sham/control tDCS. A robust FIE was obtained overall, and it was significantly reduced in the anodal group relative to sham. Critically, this reduction was driven by impaired recognition of upright faces under anodal stimulation, with no difference between groups for inverted faces. These results extend the modulation of the FIE from image to face identity recognition, demonstrating that anodal stimulation, via the Fp3-Fp2 montage, disrupts face recognition skills indexed by one of the most widely used tests of face-recognition ability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.