ArticleCureus2026
Explainable Deep Learning for COVID-19 and Pneumonia Classification in Chest X-ray Images Using Layer-Wise Relevance Propagation.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate and interpretable diagnosis of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and pneumonia from chest X-ray images is critical for timely clinical decision-making, yet many deep learning models remain difficult to interpret in medical settings. In this study, a convolutional neural network (CNN) was developed to classify chest X-ray images into healthy, pneumonia, and COVID-19 categories, and its decision-making process was analyzed using explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) techniques. Layer-wise relevance propagation (LRP) and Deep Taylor Decomposition (DTD) were applied to generate attribution heatmaps identifying image regions most influential in model predictions, and multiple LRP variants were compared under both binary and multi-class classification settings. Model performance was evaluated using accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, and confusion matrices. Explainability was assessed through complementary qualitative and quantitative analyses: heatmaps from representative clinically characterized cases were compared with reported radiographic findings, while intersection over union (IoU) quantified spatial alignment between thresholded relevance maps and manually delineated lung-field regions of interest. The binary classifier achieved 95.4% accuracy, while the three-class model achieved 95.7% overall accuracy; COVID-19 classification yielded a precision of 0.988, recall of 0.982, and F1-score of 0.985. Qualitative analysis showed that several positive-attribution methods produced relevance patterns corresponding with radiographically described pulmonary abnormalities. Quantitative IoU analysis demonstrated substantial variation in anatomical lung-field alignment across XAI methods, with the highest observed IoU values reaching approximately 0.77 at a relevance threshold of t = 0.5. Together, these results highlight the importance of combining accurate classification with interpretable model explanations for more transparent and trustworthy medical imaging applications, particularly in rural and under-resourced healthcare settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.