ArticleCureus2026
Current Therapy and Short-Term Results of Open Abdominal Management Among Non-trauma Patients.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Damage control surgery (DCS) with open abdominal management (OAM) has been established for the treatment of trauma patients; however, in recent years, it has been increasingly expanded to include the management of non-trauma patients with severe conditions. Since 2020, we have performed OAM combined with negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) for critically ill non-trauma patients. Methods We retrospectively reviewed 43 patients who underwent OAM between April 2020 and March 2024. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality, and the secondary outcomes were postoperative complications, primary fascial closure rate, and duration of OAM. Analyses of postoperative complications, duration of OAM, and primary fascial closure were restricted to patients who survived beyond 24 hours, because these outcomes could not be meaningfully assessed in patients who died shortly after the initial surgery. Results Forty-three patients (67% were men) were included in the primary outcome. The median (interquartile range) age was 71 (59-80) years, and the median Charlson Comorbidity Index was 5 (range, 4-7). Indications for OAM included bowel perforation (52%), peritonitis due to strangulated bowel obstruction (16%), postoperative anastomotic leakage (12%), intra-abdominal hemorrhage (9%), non-occlusive mesenteric ischemia (9%), and superior mesenteric artery thrombosis (2%). The mortality rate was 18.6%. Three patients who died within 24 hours were excluded from the secondary outcome analyses, leaving 40 patients for evaluation. The complication rate was 58%, and 23% of cases were classified as Clavien-Dindo grade ≥III. Intra-abdominal complications occurred, including anastomotic leakage, intra-abdominal abscess, and intestinal ischemia. Moreover, pulmonary and vascular complications (e.g., pneumonia, cerebral infarction, and ischemic heart disease) were observed. Primary fascial closure was achieved in all 40 patients included in the secondary outcome analysis (100%). Conclusion OAM with NPWT for non-trauma patients may be considered an option for patients with severe general conditions or when intra-abdominal reevaluation is necessary. Further studies are required to improve mortality and complication rates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.