ReviewJournal of pain research2026
Safety and Efficacy of Using Sugammadex in Pediatric Patients: A Narrative Review.
Review in Journal of pain research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neuromuscular blockade reversal is essential in perioperative care of pediatric patients undergoing general anesthesia, as delayed recovery may generate a plethora of complications. Traditional reversal agents like neostigmine, an acetylcholinesterase inhibitor, are widely used but have variable efficacies, adverse side effects, and the need for additional sugammadex, a novel selective relaxant binding agent with a rapid and predictable pharmacologic profile, is effective in adults and has growing interest in pediatric populations. This narrative review summarizes findings from clinical trials evaluating sugammadex safety, such as the incidence of bradycardia, hypotension, anaphylaxis, and efficacy, such as time to recovery and need for reintubation, in comparison to standard reversal agents. Available data suggest that sugammadex provides faster and more predictable reversible patterns with a more favorable safety profile. However, there are limitations in study design and dosing strategies, which demonstrate the need for additional data to compare clinical findings. Overall, sugammadex provides a promising alternative to current therapies with vast implications for clinical anesthesia practice in pediatrics. Further studies are needed to investigate optimal practices in dosing, safety, and cost-effectiveness in pediatric subgroups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.