Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42689188›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

Corticosteroid Injection Versus Surgical Decompression in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Prospective Comparative Interventional Study Using Clinical, Electrophysiological, and Sonographic Outcomes.

Shubhi Shukla, Anurag Agarwal, Anjali Singh, Shivani Rastogi, Swagat Mahapatra, Shamrendra Narayan, Samiksha Parashar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Shubhi ShuklaAnaesthesiology, Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, IND.
Anurag AgarwalAnaesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, IND.
Anjali SinghAnaesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, IND.
Shivani RastogiAnaesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, IND.
Swagat MahapatraOrthopedic Surgery, Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, IND.
Shamrendra NarayanRadiodiagnosis, Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, IND.
Samiksha ParasharAnaesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCarpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is one of the most common compressive neuropathies. Corticosteroid injection is a pharmacological treatment modality, whereas carpal tunnel release is a surgical treatment option for the management of CTS. Conservative non-pharmacological interventions include wrist splinting, therapeutic exercises, activity modification, ergonomic measures, occupational therapy, and physical therapy. However, the comparative efficacy of corticosteroid injection and surgical decompression remains controversial, particularly when evaluated using objective outcome measures. The present study compared pain relief and median nerve (MN) dynamic mobility following corticosteroid injection and carpal tunnel release in patients with CTS.

methodsThis prospective comparative interventional study included 60 patients with CTS refractory to conservative therapy. Patients were allocated to two groups by alternate consecutive assignment: surgical decompression (Group A,

resultsBoth groups demonstrated significant improvements in pain and symptom severity. No significant differences were observed between the groups in VAS pain scores or BCTQ Symptom Severity Scale (BCTQ-SSS) scores. At baseline, Group A had mean VAS scores for pain, neuroparesthesia, and functional impairment of 6.43 ± 0.97, 4.43 ± 1.76, and 4.40 ± 1.71, respectively, compared with 5.97 ± 0.93, 4.90 ± 1.65, and 3.63 ± 1.25 in Group B. At six months, these scores decreased to 1.93 ± 0.87, 1.17 ± 0.38, and 1.13 ± 0.35 in Group A and to 1.87 ± 0.68, 1.77 ± 0.97, and 2.27 ± 1.17 in Group B. Mean BCTQ symptom severity scores decreased from 45.03 ± 4.73 to 11.30 ± 2.37 in Group A and from 43.20 ± 6.03 to 11.53 ± 2.15 in Group B. Functional outcomes were significantly better in the surgical group. MN mobility improved significantly following surgery compared with corticosteroid injection. Comparison of MN parameters immediately after the procedure and at six months showed no significant differences between the groups except for MN mobility, which was greater in Group A than in Group B (14.51 ± 1.49 vs. 13.62 ± 0.98; p = 0.008). No significant between-group differences were observed in electrophysiological parameters.

conclusionBoth treatment modalities were effective in improving symptoms of CTS. However, surgical decompression provided superior functional recovery and greater improvement in MN mobility than corticosteroid injection.

Indexed as

carpal tunnel releasecarpal tunnel syndromecorticosteroid injectionmedian nervenerve conduction studyneuroparesthesianocturnal painultrasound

Identifiers

PMID42689188
PMCPMC13537219

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.