Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42689184›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

Effectiveness of Different Toothbrushing Methods on Plaque Accumulation and Gingival Health in Patients With Fixed Orthodontic Appliances.

Merry Goyal, Sanjay Mittal, Baljeet Singh, Isha Aggarwal, Kanish Aggarwal, Pallavi Vishavkarma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Merry GoyalDepartment of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Bhojia Dental College and Hospital, Baddi, IND.
Sanjay MittalDepartment of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Bhojia Dental College and Hospital, Baddi, IND.
Baljeet SinghDepartment of Periodontics, Himachal Dental College, Sunder Nagar, IND.
Isha AggarwalDepartment of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Bhojia Dental College and Hospital, Baddi, IND.
Kanish AggarwalDepartment of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Bhojia Dental College and Hospital, Baddi, IND.
Pallavi VishavkarmaDepartment of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, T-Rex Dental Clinic, Nalagarh, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMaintaining adequate oral hygiene during fixed orthodontic treatment is challenging because brackets, archwires, and ligatures promote plaque retention and increase the risk of gingival inflammation. Various toothbrush designs have been introduced to improve plaque removal; however, their comparative effectiveness in orthodontic patients remains unclear. We aimed to compare the effectiveness of different toothbrushing methods in maintaining plaque control and gingival health among patients undergoing fixed orthodontic treatment. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis prospective study included 90 participants undergoing fixed orthodontic treatment who were divided into five equal groups (n = 18 each) according to the prescribed toothbrushing method: conventional manual toothbrush, orthodontic manual toothbrush, powered electric toothbrush, conventional manual toothbrush with an interdental brush, and orthodontic manual toothbrush with an interdental brush. Plaque accumulation and gingival health were assessed at baseline and monthly intervals for six months using orthodontic plaque and gingival indices. Data were analyzed using two-way repeated-measures analysis of variance with appropriate post hoc tests, and statistical significance was established at p < 0.05.

resultsAll toothbrushing methods demonstrated progressive improvements in plaque and gingival scores during the six-month follow-up. Mean plaque index decreased from 1.16 ± 0.51 to 0.35 ± 0.12 in the conventional manual toothbrush group and from 1.07 ± 0.54 to 0.22 ± 0.12 in the powered electric toothbrush group. The gingival index decreased from 1.66 ± 0.48 to 0.39 ± 0.19 in the conventional manual toothbrush group and from 1.46 ± 0.61 to 0.28 ± 0.18 in the orthodontic manual toothbrush with interdental brush group. There was a significant main effect of time on both the plaque and gingival indices (p < 0.001). The group effect was significant for gingival index (p < 0.001) but not for plaque index (p = 0.178). No significant group × time interactions were observed. Post hoc analysis showed a significantly lower plaque index in the powered electric toothbrush group than in the conventional manual toothbrush group (p = 0.032).

conclusionsAll evaluated toothbrushing methods improved oral hygiene and gingival health during fixed orthodontic treatment. The powered electric toothbrush showed the greatest plaque reduction and a statistically significant advantage over conventional manual toothbrushes in a post hoc comparison. In contrast, the orthodontic manual toothbrush combined with an interdental brush demonstrated the most favorable gingival health outcomes. Regular reinforcement of oral hygiene practices, together with appropriate toothbrush selection tailored to individual patient needs, may help minimize plaque-related complications during orthodontic treatment.

Indexed as

dental plaquegingivitisoral hygieneorthodontic appliancestooth brushing

Identifiers

PMID42689184
PMCPMC13537091

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.