ArticleEuropean heart journal. Imaging methods and practice2026
Diagnostic value of positron emission tomography using amyloid-binding radiotracers for cardiac amyloidosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims: Amyloid-binding positron emission tomography (PET) tracers have emerged as a promising non-invasive tool for the diagnosis of cardiac amyloidosis (CA). This study aimed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of amyloid PET for detecting CA through a meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy. Methods and results: PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science were searched through 16 March 2026 for studies reporting the diagnostic performance of amyloid PET for CA. The primary analysis was a bivariate random-effects (Reitsma) model yielding summary sensitivity, specificity, the summary receiver operating characteristics curve with corresponding area under the curve (AUC), and positive and negative likelihood ratios. Subgroup analyses were performed by radiotracer and by amyloid subtype. Risk of bias was assessed using QUADAS-2 and publication bias by Deeks' funnel-plot asymmetry test. Twenty studies comprising 577 patients (407 with CA, 170 controls) met inclusion criteria, covering five radiotracers ( Conclusion: Amyloid PET demonstrates high sensitivity and specificity for CA detection, even though the evidence base remains limited in terms of the number and scope of available studies. Prospective multicentre studies in consecutive patients with suspected CA are required to establish its clinical role and standardize acquisition protocols.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.