ReviewFrontiers in psychiatry2026
Functional psychosurgery in psychiatry: indications and preoperative evaluation. A narrative review.
Review in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Functional neurosurgery has evolved from a marginal and controversial intervention into a promising, technically feasible option for carefully selected patients with treatment-resistant psychiatric disorders. Among available techniques, deep brain stimulation has gained increasing clinical acceptance for selected patients with severe obsessive-compulsive disorder and Tourette syndrome, while other psychiatric indications, including treatment-resistant depression, substance use disorders, schizophrenia, anorexia nervosa and pathological aggression, remain largely investigational or restricted to clinical trials and highly specialized programs. However, the absence of harmonized preoperative assessment standards across centers highlights the need for a structured, multidisciplinary framework to guide consistent clinical decision-making and ensure procedural safety. The framework proposed in this review is intended to support structured clinical profiling and outcome monitoring, but should not be interpreted as a substitute for professional consensus recommendations, multidisciplinary clinical judgment, ethics committee review, or applicable regulatory requirements. This narrative review examines the current role of functional psychosurgery in psychiatry, with particular focus on structured preoperative assessment models that optimize patient characterization within specialized clinical settings. We propose a pragmatic, circuit-informed framework integrating diagnostic precision, psychopathological assessment, neuropsychological profiling, functional evaluation, and ethical-regulatory oversight. By synthesizing evidence across psychiatric disorders, neurobiological models, and multidimensional assessment strategies, we outline a practical framework for preoperative characterization and outcome monitoring in psychiatric neurosurgery. When applied within specialized centers and under rigorous clinical, ethical, and regulatory oversight, functional psychosurgery may offer clinically meaningful symptom relief and improved quality of life for carefully selected patients who have exhausted conventional treatments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.