Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42689106›Full record

ArticleJournal of dental sciences2026

Vinh Quang Luu, Nhan Duc Le, Bich-Ly Thi Nguyen, Son Hoang Le

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of dental sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Vinh Quang LuuDepartment of Oral Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam.
Nhan Duc LeDepartment of Oral Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam.
Bich-Ly Thi NguyenDepartment of Oral Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam.
Son Hoang LeDepartment of Oral Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background/purpose: Characteristics of grafting material influence its osteoconductive and osteoinductive properties. This study aimed to compare tooth-derived particles (TDPs) with dentin-derived particles (DDPs) with respect to particle size, demineralization behavior, elemental composition, and cytotoxicity. Materials and methods: TDP materials and DDP materials were cleaned, air-dried, ground using a Smart Dentin Grinder (KometaBio, Bergen, NJ, United States), and sorted by particle size. Both materials were demineralized with 10 % ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) at various time points and analyzed by scanning electron microscopy and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy to determine the structural changes and the time required to reach 30 % residual Ca. Samples that achieved this level were subsequently evaluated for cytotoxicity according to ISO 10993-12:2021. Results: Particle size distribution was significantly different between TDPs and DDPs. The proportion of particles suitable for grafting was higher in DDPs (69.12 %) than in TDPs (55.98 %). Although the percentages of Ca and P during demineralization were slightly higher in TDPs than in DDPs, the differences were not significant. Both Ca and P contents, as well as the Ca/P ratio, decreased significantly with increasing demineralization time. Samples from both groups, adjusted to approximately 30 % residual Ca, were non-cytotoxic and met the ISO safety criteria for biological experimentation. Conclusion: DDPs have a more favorable size distribution than TDPs, requiring 17-20 min of 10 % EDTA to reach optimal 70 % Ca removal. The resulting materials are non-cytotoxic, supporting their safe and effective use as autogenous grafts.

Indexed as

CytotoxicityDentin graftEDSParticle sizeSEM

Identifiers

PMID42689106
PMCPMC13536452

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.