ArticleJournal of dental sciences2026
A novel method for the precise second mesiobuccal canal orifice location: A combined strategy for enhanced clinical practice.
Article in Journal of dental sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background/purpose: Successful root canal treatment relies on thorough canal disinfection. The second mesiobuccal (MB2) canals in maxillary molars poses a significant clinical challenge due to its complex anatomy and high prevalence. The conventional perpendicular line method for MB2 canal orifice localization has notable limitations in achieving precise point identification. This study evaluates a novel combined method that integrates the perpendicular line and parallel line principles to enhance the accuracy of MB2 canal orifice localization. Materials and methods: This study analyzed 73 CBCT scans of maxillary first molars with identifiable MB2 canals. A novel combined method integrating the perpendicular line and parallel line principles was compared with the conventional perpendicular line method for MB2 canal orifice localization. Prediction accuracy was evaluated based on coordinate measurements and assessed through analysis of spatial and linear distributions. Results: The combined method demonstrated significantly higher accuracy, with data points tightly clustered near the actual MB2 canal orifice versus the scattered distribution of the perpendicular line method. The 95 % confidence ellipse area was substantially smaller for the combined method (1.63 mm Conclusion: The combined method, which integrates the perpendicular line and parallel line principles, demonstrated superior accuracy in MB2 canal orifice localization, providing significant clinical value for the rapid and precise localization of the MB2 canal orifice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.