ArticleJournal of dental sciences2026
Exploring various types of dental practitioners in Taiwan based on dental-related laws and regulations during the Japanese colonial period (1895-1945).
Article in Journal of dental sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background/purpose: During the Japanese colonial period in Taiwan (1895-1945), the medical management system included a complex set of laws and regulations governing dental practice. This study aimed to explore and classify the various types of dental practitioners in Taiwan during this era. Materials and methods: Both direct and indirect historical materials related to medical and dental laws and regulations issued during the Japanese colonial period in Taiwan were collected and analyzed. Content regarding dental practitioners and their qualification requirements was extracted, compared, and categorized to reconstruct eight types of dental practitioners during this period. Results: Analysis of legal documents revealed a series of regulations that shaped dental practice, beginning with the 1896 Taiwan Medical Practice Regulations and later including the Taiwan Dentists Order (1916), the Limited-location Physicians and Dentists Licensing Policies (1916-1918), and other regulations defining dental authority among physicians. Based on these regulations, eight types of dental practitioners were identified and grouped into three categories: (1) those with formal school education and training (dentists and three types of physicians with various dental licenses); (2) those who passed examinations based on experience or workplace training (e.g., traditional Chinese medicine practitioners, limited-location physicians/dentists); and (3) those granted special permission to continue specific dental work (denturists and tooth extractors). Conclusion: Dental practice in Taiwan during the Japanese colonial period was diverse, shaped by evolving laws and practical needs. Eight distinct types of dental practitioners emerged, reflecting a multi-layered dental qualification system that integrated formal education, examinations, and special permissions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.