ReviewJournal of dental sciences2026
Needle breakage during dental anesthesia: Management strategies and its associated preventive measures.
Review in Journal of dental sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Predictors of Dental Needle Bevel Deformation: Gauge, Insertion Frequency, and Length as Key Determinants.Dentistry journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dental anesthesia is useful and important for the procedures of tooth extraction, oral tissue biopsy, periapical and periodontal surgery and more others. However, needle breakage during dental anesthesia, presents a considerable challenge in its clinical management. Retained fragments can lead to pain, trismus, dysphagia, and infections, and may migrate into deeper spaces, increasing the complexity and risk upon its retrieval. To avoid such consequences, prompt removal of the broken fragment is often advocated. However, no standard guidelines were developed. This review provides a comprehensive analysis of the current imaging modalities and surgical techniques used in fragment localization and retrieval. The surgical approaches may vary depending on the location of broken fragment. In addition, the use of C-arm fluoroscopy, endoscopes, dynamic navigation systems and static surgical guides can facilitate the surgery. Conversely, magnets and metal detectors have shown to be ineffective. Factors such as needle location, patient cooperation, systemic health, maximum mouth opening, and surgical risks must be carefully considered. Additionally, this article emphasizes the importance of prevention. Proper injection techniques, use of long and thicker needles, adequate patient preparation, and avoiding prebending are critical to reduce the risk of breakage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.