ArticleJournal of dental sciences2026
Expanded classification for immediate molar implant placement: Integrating root socket strategies beyond septal bone typing.
Article in Journal of dental sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background/purpose: This conceptual development study with exploratory clinical analysis aimed to create and preliminarily evaluate a six-category classification system for immediate implant placement (IIP) in molar extraction sites. IIP in molar regions remains challenging due to complex socket morphology and variable septal bone availability. Existing septal-based classifications (e.g., Smith-Tarnow) may exclude viable cases with favorable root socket anatomy. The system was developed through literature review, CBCT-based anatomical analysis, and Delphi expert consensus, with clinical applicability assessed via retrospective review of 64 M IIP cases. Materials and methods: A classification system combining septal bone conditions (Types A-C) and root socket-based anchorage (Types D, M, and P) was developed through literature review, CBCT-based anatomical assessment, retrospective case evaluation, and expert consensus via a Delphi process. Results: Type A demonstrated highest predictability (insertion torque >30 N/cm, survival >90 %). Type B commonly required grafting for gaps>2mm, while Type C relied on adequate buccolingual cortical engagement. Types D and M provided reliable anchorage in suitable sockets with careful prosthetic planning. Type P showed consistently high primary stability (ISQ >60), minimal early marginal bone loss (<0.2 mm at 6-24 months), and favorable short-term outcomes, supporting its role as a sinus augmentation alternative in selected maxillary molars. Conclusion: The proposed six-category system provides a comprehensive anatomy-based framework for molar IIP, integrating septal and root-specific considerations to expand case selection, shorten treatment time, and maintain predictable outcomes, serving as a decision-making adjunct to comprehensive anatomical and prosthetic assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.