Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42689009›Full record

ArticleBMJ public health2026

What are the barriers and enablers to the uptake of the HPV vaccine in Romania, Bulgaria and Croatia? A mixed methods systematic review.

Clare Bennett, Hannah R Williams, Deborah Edwards, Elizabeth Gillen, Anne Rebafka, Marko Gangur, Momchil Kostov Baev, Alina Comanescu, Olivia Bell, Leanne Sawle and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Clare BennettHealth Innovation West Midlands, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5144-3894
Hannah R WilliamsSchool of Healthcare Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-6058-1616
Deborah EdwardsSchool of Healthcare Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1885-9297
Elizabeth GillenSchool of Healthcare Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3700-3913
Anne RebafkaMedical Center and Faculty of Medicine - University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0516-5248
Marko GangurEuropean Cancer Organisation, Brussels, Belgium.
Momchil Kostov BaevHealthcare and Social Work, New Bulgarian University, Sofia, Bulgaria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1142-416X
Alina ComanescuEuropean Cancer Organisation, Brussels, Belgium.
Olivia BellUniversity of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-4589-3142
Leanne SawleSchool of Healthcare Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8478-8816
Georgi Kostov BaevNational and Regional Security, Vasil Levski National Military University, Veliko Tarnovo, Bulgaria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-9202-9836
Daniel KellySchool of Healthcare Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1847-0655

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Eradication of human papillomavirus (HPV) is a global public health priority. It is linked to approximately 5% of all cancers, causing almost all cases of cervical cancer, nearly 90% of anal cancers and a significant proportion of oropharyngeal, penile, vaginal and vulval cancers.HPV vaccination can provide protection when 90% coverage is reached. However, many countries are yet to achieve this threshold. Uptake in Romania, Bulgaria and Croatia has been low historically, and although rates are increasing, vaccine coverage remains significantly lower than the recommended WHO rate of 90%. This systematic review sought to identify the barriers and enablers to HPV vaccine uptake in these three countries. Methods: The Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) convergent integrated methodological framework for mixed methods systematic reviews was employed. Seven databases were searched from inception to April 2024. No restrictions were imposed on language or setting. All included studies were critically appraised with JBI Critical Appraisal tools. Data extraction was performed using standardised tools with an emphasis on equity, followed by data transformation and data synthesis. Each stage was conducted by two independent reviewers. Bronfenbrenner's socio-ecological model was applied as a theoretical lens. Results: A total of 402 findings from 31 studies were extracted and aggregated to form 65 categories. These were further combined in a meta-synthesis which yielded 13 synthesised findings. The meta synthesis identified commonalities across each country's findings: attitudes towards HPV vaccination were characterised by distrust and misconceptions; knowledge deficits existed particularly in relation to gender neutral provision; and a lack of consensus among health professionals concerning the efficacy and safety of the vaccine impacted intention and uptake. Conclusions: Barriers and enablers to HPV vaccine uptake centred on knowledge and trust. Public health interventions that address the concerns of young people, parents and health professionals are pivotal to improving HPV vaccine coverage across the three countries. Contemporaneous research to further explore the social, cultural and political factors that impede acceptance of the HPV vaccine is also required. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42024523200.

Indexed as

Communicable Disease ControlHuman Papillomavirus VirusesPrimary PreventionPublic HealthSexual Health

Identifiers

PMID42689009
PMCPMC13536049

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.