ArticleBMJ public health2026
What are the barriers and enablers to the uptake of the HPV vaccine in Romania, Bulgaria and Croatia? A mixed methods systematic review.
Article in BMJ public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Eradication of human papillomavirus (HPV) is a global public health priority. It is linked to approximately 5% of all cancers, causing almost all cases of cervical cancer, nearly 90% of anal cancers and a significant proportion of oropharyngeal, penile, vaginal and vulval cancers.HPV vaccination can provide protection when 90% coverage is reached. However, many countries are yet to achieve this threshold. Uptake in Romania, Bulgaria and Croatia has been low historically, and although rates are increasing, vaccine coverage remains significantly lower than the recommended WHO rate of 90%. This systematic review sought to identify the barriers and enablers to HPV vaccine uptake in these three countries. Methods: The Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) convergent integrated methodological framework for mixed methods systematic reviews was employed. Seven databases were searched from inception to April 2024. No restrictions were imposed on language or setting. All included studies were critically appraised with JBI Critical Appraisal tools. Data extraction was performed using standardised tools with an emphasis on equity, followed by data transformation and data synthesis. Each stage was conducted by two independent reviewers. Bronfenbrenner's socio-ecological model was applied as a theoretical lens. Results: A total of 402 findings from 31 studies were extracted and aggregated to form 65 categories. These were further combined in a meta-synthesis which yielded 13 synthesised findings. The meta synthesis identified commonalities across each country's findings: attitudes towards HPV vaccination were characterised by distrust and misconceptions; knowledge deficits existed particularly in relation to gender neutral provision; and a lack of consensus among health professionals concerning the efficacy and safety of the vaccine impacted intention and uptake. Conclusions: Barriers and enablers to HPV vaccine uptake centred on knowledge and trust. Public health interventions that address the concerns of young people, parents and health professionals are pivotal to improving HPV vaccine coverage across the three countries. Contemporaneous research to further explore the social, cultural and political factors that impede acceptance of the HPV vaccine is also required. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42024523200.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.