ArticleBMJ neurology open2026
Association between probable postictal psychosis and subsequent diagnosis of primary psychotic disorders: a retrospective cohort study.
Article in BMJ neurology open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rationale: Postictal psychosis (PIP) is a transient psychiatric phenomenon characterised by psychotic symptoms following a seizure. While its immediate manifestations have been well documented, there is limited understanding of its long-term implications, particularly its relationship with subsequent primary psychotic disorders. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using de-identified patient data from the TriNetX database (2006-2026). Individuals aged 18-65 years with a diagnosis of probable PIP (International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM): F06.0, F06.2) or brief psychotic disorder within 7 days of the epileptic disorder diagnosis (ICD-10-CM: F23) were propensity-score matched 1:1 with controls without PIP based on age, sex, race, ethnicity and relevant psychiatric and chronic physical comorbidities. We excluded individuals with prior psychotic disorders or delirium. The primary outcome was any psychotic disorder diagnosis within a 5-year follow-up period. Kaplan-Meier survival analyses and HRs were calculated to assess the differences in survival probabilities. Results: A total of 1275 individuals were identified and matched for analysis. Patients with probable PIP were at significantly higher risk for subsequent psychotic disorders (HR=10.78, 95% CI 6.21 to 18.70, p=0.002). The 5-year survival probability for developing any psychotic disorder was 85.79% in the probable PIP group compared with 98.21% in controls (log-rank test, χ Conclusions: Probable PIP is associated with a heightened risk of subsequent primary psychotic disorders, including interictal forms, within 5 years.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.