ArticleAnaesthesia reports
Development of a survey evaluating patient Concerns Over Peri-operative Events (COPE).
Article in Anaesthesia reports. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Anxiety frequently burdens patients before surgery, potentially leading to poorer recovery. However, standard assessment tools typically quantify the intensity of this distress without understanding its root cause. This often leaves clinicians unaware of the specific fears driving a patient's anxiety. We aimed to address this deficit by developing and validating a questionnaire designed to identify individual pre-operative concerns. An iterative development process resulted in a 14-item questionnaire: Concerns Over Peri-operative Events (COPE). We conducted a prospective evaluation of 52 patients having elective surgery, measuring the questionnaire's performance against the Amsterdam Pre-operative Anxiety and Information Scale. The questionnaire performed well on metrics of validity, reliability and acceptability. Severe pain was the most reported concern. The median (IQR [range]) total COPE score was 30 (22-44 [14-63]). There was a positive correlation between the Amsterdam Pre-operative Anxiety and Information Scale and COPE scores. A classification model to predict Amsterdam Pre-operative Anxiety and Information Scale-positive status demonstrated excellent discrimination with an area under the curve of 0.86. An optimal COPE score of ≥ 34 demonstrated 88% sensitivity and 81% specificity. While future research should focus on generalisability, this novel questionnaire of patient concerns facilitates the identification of specific drivers of pre-operative anxiety. By bridging the gap between clinicians' assumptions and patient experience, the COPE questionnaire may facilitate targeted therapies and improve informed consent.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.