ArticleCureus2026
Three-Year Experience of Cytogenetic and Molecular Genetic Evaluation in Patients With Disorders of Sex Development at a Tertiary Care Centre in Eastern India.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesDisorders of sex development (DSD) include a range of conditions in which chromosomal, gonadal, or anatomical sex deviates from the typical developmental pathway. The diagnostic approach to DSD has shifted from karyotyping to molecular genetic tools. This study evaluated the clinical presentation, cytogenetic spectrum, and diagnostic utility of conventional and advanced molecular genetic investigations in patients with suspected DSD managed at a tertiary care facility in Eastern India over a three-year period.
methodsA retrospective observational study was conducted at the Genetics Laboratory of a tertiary care teaching hospital in Eastern India. Consecutive patients with clinically suspected DSD referred between January 2022 and December 2024 were included. Demographic and clinical data were obtained from referral records, and peripheral blood samples were analysed using standard G-banded karyotyping according to the International System for Human Cytogenomic Nomenclature (ISCN 2020). Fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH), chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA), and whole-genome sequencing (WGS) were selectively performed in cases with inconclusive cytogenetic findings, suspected structural chromosomal abnormalities, or complex phenotypes.
resultsA total of 98 suspected DSD cases were evaluated during the study period. The most frequent chromosomal constitution was 46,XY DSD (37, 37.8%), followed by 46,XX DSD (30, 30.6%) and sex chromosome DSD (21, 21.4%). Culture failure occurred in 10 (10.2%) samples. Advanced genetic techniques, including FISH, CMA, and WGS, improved diagnostic clarification in selected complex cases.
conclusionThis experience highlights the importance of integrating contemporary high-resolution technologies with conventional cytogenetics to enhance the assessment, counselling, and treatment of individuals with DSD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.