Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42688961›Full record

ReviewBMJ oncology2026

Aligning awareness, systems and policy to increase equitable access to genomically driven cancer care.

Kelly Kohut, Joshua Asaad Kuti, Sandra Balladares, Nicola Reents, Raza Sayyed, Benedito Mauro Rossi, Janina Balazar-Palacios, Bami Adenipekun, Nicolò Matteo Luca Battisti, Csaba László Dégi and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMJ oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Kelly KohutDepartment of Clinical and Biomedical Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9852-2872
Joshua Asaad KutiRespiratory Medicine, University College London, London, UK.
Sandra BalladaresBreast Cancer Community Leader and patient advocate, Cancer Patient Lab Volunteer, SVP Product and Marketing Strategy, Inocras, Patient Advocate, San Diego, California, USA.
Nicola ReentsSemiColon, Netzwerk für Menschen mit Lynch-Syndrom, Bonn, Germany.
Raza SayyedColorectal Surgery, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, UK.
Benedito Mauro RossiGenomic Medicine Service, Hospital Beneficência Portuguesa de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Janina Balazar-PalaciosFacultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Privada Norbert Wiener, Lima, Peru.
Bami AdenipekunInspired to Soar, Swansea, UK.
Nicolò Matteo Luca BattistiRoyal Marsden Hospital NHS Trust, Sutton, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1063-1717
Csaba László DégiFaculty of Sociology and Social Work, Babeș Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Mev Dominguez-ValentinDepartment of Tumor Biology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genomic testing has the potential to transform cancer care across the patient pathway. However, its benefits remain unevenly realised across populations and health systems. Precision oncology is characterised by a strong promissory discourse, with expectations of improved outcomes and cost-effectiveness, yet real-world implementation remains variable and context dependent. This review examines how patient and public awareness interacts with, and is constrained by, structural, organisational and political-economic factors that shape equitable access to genomically driven cancer care across five themes: (1) the power of patient and public advocacy; (2) learning from the patient perspective; (3) culturally responsive communication; (4) structural and personal barriers and facilitators and (5) political economy of health. Examples are mapped across global regions to highlight how health system, structural and societal factors continue to limit the universal realisation of genomic medicine's benefits. We present four recommendations to strengthen the translation of awareness into equitable access and clinical impact: (1) expand and adequately power genomic studies in underserved populations; (2) improve risk communication and decision-making across the cancer pathway; (3) equitable validation and interpretation of emerging genomic technologies and (4) generate real-world evidence on access, uptake and outcomes of genome-matched therapies. Embedding awareness, trust, access and equity in future initiatives is imperative to realise the promise of precision medicine for all patients.

Indexed as

BiomarkersCancer screeningEthnic and Racial MinoritiesGenetic markersHealth Services Research

Identifiers

PMID42688961
PMCPMC13536159

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.