ArticleFrontiers in toxicology2026
Case Report: Serial blood benzene and urinary phenol monitoring during extracorporeal treatment after severe acute oral ingestion of a benzene-containing solvent.
Article in Frontiers in toxicology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Acute oral benzene poisoning is uncommon, and evidence to guide extracorporeal treatment and bedside toxicokinetic interpretation in this setting is limited. Most published experience concerns inhalational exposure or chronic hematotoxicity, leaving clinicians with little practical guidance for managing large intentional ingestions. Case Report: An 18-year-old man presented approximately 12 h after ingesting about 200 mL of a commercial benzene standard solution in ethyl acetate as intentional self-poisoning. On admission he had tachycardia, persistent gastrointestinal symptoms, and laboratory confirmation of exposure, with benzene detected in gastric fluid (2,966 μg/L), blood (457 μg/L), and urine (224 μg/L). Before gastric lavage, toxicological confirmation was obtained in all three matrices. After decontamination and supportive care, sequential hemoperfusion and continuous veno-venous hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF) were initiated. Serial toxicological monitoring showed rapid decline of the parent compound-blood benzene decreased to 228 μg/L at 20 h, 78 μg/L at 28 h, and became undetectable by 32 h-whereas urinary phenol rose later, peaking at 3231.5 mg/L at 32 h before declining over subsequent days. The clinical course included rhabdomyolysis, transient liver injury, erosive gastritis, and transient nonspecific white-matter abnormalities on brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The patient recovered without persistent neurologic deficit and returned to usual activities. Conclusion: In severe acute oral ingestion of a benzene-containing solvent, paired monitoring of the parent compound and a major metabolite provided clinically useful information to contextualize extracorporeal treatment when formal decision thresholds were unavailable. This case cannot establish treatment efficacy, but it illustrates a pragmatic monitoring framework that may assist clinicians interpreting late toxicokinetic trends in rare but high-risk solvent ingestions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.