Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42688915›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in digital health2026

Outside the healthy bounds: reference intervals for population and individual-level medical speech analysis.

Pascal Hecker, Monica Gonzalez-Machorro, Catarina Botelho, Helly Hammer, Hesam Sagha, Matthias Kahlau, Robert Hoepner, Florian Eyben, Björn W Schuller, Bert Arnrich

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Pascal HeckerDigital Health-Connected Healthcare, Hasso Plattner Institute, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany.
Monica Gonzalez-MachorroaudEERING GmbH, Gilching, Germany.
Catarina BotelhoHLT-Human Language Technologies Lab, INESC-ID, Lisbon, Portugal.
Helly HammerDepartment of Neurology, Inselspital and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Hesam SaghaaudEERING GmbH, Gilching, Germany.
Matthias KahlauaudEERING GmbH, Gilching, Germany.
Robert HoepnerDepartment of Neurology, Inselspital and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Florian EybenaudEERING GmbH, Gilching, Germany.
Björn W SchulleraudEERING GmbH, Gilching, Germany.
Bert ArnrichDigital Health-Connected Healthcare, Hasso Plattner Institute, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reference intervals (RIs) are a well-established clinical tool for defining healthy bounds of laboratory measures. Recently, they have been applied to acoustic features extracted from speech to provide a transparent and disorder-agnostic perspective on symptomatic speakers. We evaluate the potential and limitations of RIs across three datasets: clean, laboratory recordings from people with multiple sclerosis (pwMS) and two noisy datasets targeting respiratory symptoms and work-related stress, collected under everyday-life conditions. At the population level, we compare the proportion of features outside the RI bounds between control and symptomatic groups, test noise augmentation of the RI-estimation corpus for improved robustness, and identify the most indicative acoustic features for each health condition. At the individual level, we derive a per-speaker deviation score that quantifies how far each speaker's acoustic profile deviates from the healthy reference, and assess its discriminative ability using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Noise augmentation of the healthy reference corpus yields similar population-level separation; the continuous

Indexed as

artificial intelligence – AIcomputational paralinguisticsdigital health (e-health)noise robustnesspersonalised healthcarereference intervals (RIs)speech analysis and processingspeech biomarkers

Identifiers

PMID42688915
PMCPMC13535962

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.