ReviewKardiochirurgia i torakochirurgia polska = Polish journal of cardio-thoracic surgery2026
Contemporary overview of current percutaneous mechanical circulatory support devices for advanced heart failure: a narrative review.
Review in Kardiochirurgia i torakochirurgia polska = Polish journal of cardio-thoracic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mechanical circulatory support devices have become essential in the management of acute hemodynamic compromise, providing rapid, minimally invasive augmentation of cardiac output in heart failure, cardiogenic shock, high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention, post-cardiotomy ventricular dysfunction, and refractory cardiac arrest. Unlike conventional ventricular assist systems, percutaneous mechanical circulatory support devices are designed for swift deployment through peripheral vascular access and are intended for short-term support. Advancements over recent decades have substantially broadened the range of these devices. They vary widely in mechanism of action, flow capability, insertion technique, and hemodynamic targets, allowing tailored support for left-, right-, or biventricular failure. Parallel to technological innovation, evidence from major trials and international registries has refined contemporary practice by characterizing hemodynamic benefits, procedural outcomes, and device-specific limitations. This review synthesizes contemporary knowledge on pMCS systems, their designs, physiological effects, clinical indications, and limitations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.