Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42688846›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

Effect of Different Post-space Pretreatment Agents on the Push-Out Bond Strength of Fibre Posts Cemented With Self-Adhesive Resin Cement: An In Vitro Study.

Shalini Kumari, Sufia Parveen, Chi Koy Wang, Abhinav Kumar Singh, Somnath Pal, Binoy Kumar Singh, Amit Kumar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Shalini KumariDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Buddha Institute of Dental Sciences and Hospital, Patna, IND.
Sufia ParveenDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Buddha Institute of Dental Sciences and Hospital, Patna, IND.
Chi Koy WangDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Buddha Institute of Dental Sciences and Hospital, Patna, IND.
Abhinav Kumar SinghDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Buddha Institute of Dental Sciences and Hospital, Patna, IND.
Somnath PalDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Buddha Institute of Dental Sciences and Hospital, Patna, IND.
Binoy Kumar SinghDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Buddha Institute of Dental Sciences and Hospital, Patna, IND.
Amit KumarDepartment of Dermatology, Madhubani Medical College and Hospital, Madhubani, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe long-term success of fibre post restorations is multifactorial and depends on several biomechanical and restorative factors, including the ferrule effect, the amount of remaining coronal tooth structure, restoration design, occlusal loading, and the quality of adhesion between the fibre post, resin cement, and radicular dentin. Among these factors, durable adhesive bonding is considered essential for enhancing post retention and the longevity of the restoration. The smear layer created during post-space preparation may compromise this adhesion by limiting resin infiltration. Pretreatment of the post space with different conditioning agents has been proposed to improve the bonding performance of self-adhesive resin cements; however, comparative evidence regarding these four conditioning agents remains limited. The present study aimed to evaluate and compare the effect of different post-space pretreatment agents on the push-out bond strength of glass fibre posts luted with self-adhesive resin cement. MATERIALS AND

methodsForty extracted human permanent maxillary central incisors were endodontically treated and randomly allocated into four groups (n = 10) according to the post-space pretreatment agent used: Group I (17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA)), Group II (10% citric acid), Group III (10% polyacrylic acid), and Group IV (37% phosphoric acid). Following standardised post-space preparation, glass fibre posts were cemented using a self-adhesive resin cement. Each specimen was sectioned into 2-mm-thick slices representing the coronal, middle, and apical thirds of the root. Push-out bond strength was evaluated using a universal testing machine and expressed in megapascals (MPa). Data were analysed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey's honestly significant difference (HSD) post-hoc test for intergroup comparisons, and a linear mixed-effects model (REML) followed by Tukey's multiple comparisons test for within-group comparisons among the coronal, middle, and apical root thirds. A P-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

resultsThe 37% phosphoric acid group demonstrated the highest push-out bond strength at all root levels, followed by 10% polyacrylic acid, 10% citric acid, and 17% EDTA, which consistently showed the lowest values. Bond strength progressively decreased from the coronal to the apical third in all pretreatment groups. One-way ANOVA revealed significant intergroup differences at the coronal, middle, and apical root levels (all

conclusionPost-space pretreatment significantly influenced the immediate push-out bond strength of glass fibre posts cemented with self-adhesive resin cement. Among the conditioning agents evaluated, 37% phosphoric acid demonstrated the highest bond strength. Further in vivo studies are needed to confirm the clinical applicability of these findings.

Indexed as

edtaendodontically treated teethglass fibre postphosphoric acidpost-space pretreatmentpush-out bond strengthradicular dentinself-adhesive resin cement

Identifiers

PMID42688846
PMCPMC13537213

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.