Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42688820›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

Comparative Evaluation of Changes in Brain Activity Among Edentulous Patients Rehabilitated With Conventional Complete Dentures and Tooth-Supported Overdentures Using Electroencephalography: An In Vivo Study.

Shabir Ahmed Shah, Schubert Anto R, Mansi Manohar Gadhe, Adiba Ihsan, Shazia Kosar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Shabir Ahmed ShahDepartment of Prosthodontics and Crown and Bridge, Government Dental College and Hospital, Srinagar, IND.
Schubert Anto RDepartment of Prosthodontics and Crown and Bridge, Government Dental College and Hospital, Srinagar, IND.
Mansi Manohar GadheDepartment of Prosthodontics and Crown and Bridge, Government Dental College and Hospital, Srinagar, IND.
Adiba IhsanDepartment of Prosthodontics and Crown and Bridge, Government Dental College and Hospital, Srinagar, IND.
Shazia KosarDepartment of Prosthodontics and Crown and Bridge, Government Dental College and Hospital, Srinagar, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionEdentulism is associated with impaired masticatory function and reduced sensory stimulation that may adversely affect cortical activity and cognitive health. However, evidence comparing the effects of different removable prosthetic rehabilitation modalities on brain activity is limited. Our study aimed to evaluate and compare changes in brain activity using electroencephalography among completely edentulous patients rehabilitated with conventional complete dentures, tooth-supported overdentures without attachments, and tooth-supported overdentures with stud attachments. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis prospective observational study included 36 participants aged 60-80 years who fulfilled the eligibility criteria. The participants received routine prosthodontic treatment based on their clinical condition, were non-randomized, and were categorized into three groups (n = 12 each): conventional complete dentures, tooth-supported overdentures without attachments, and tooth-supported overdentures with stud attachments. Baseline electroencephalographic recordings were obtained before treatment and repeated after two months of prosthesis use under standardized recording conditions. Baseline demographic characteristics were compared using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the chi-square test. Changes in brain activity over time were evaluated using a mixed-design repeated-measures ANOVA, with supplementary independent-samples and paired-samples t-tests for pairwise and within-group comparisons. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.

resultsThe three groups were comparable in terms of age and sex at baseline. Significant changes were noticed in the measured electroencephalographic parameter after prosthodontic rehabilitation in all three groups (p ≤ 0.001). The observed increase in the EEG-derived measure following prosthodontic rehabilitation is interpreted as reflecting enhanced cortical electrical activity associated with restoration of masticatory function. However, because EEG provides an indirect measure of neural activity, these findings should not be interpreted as definitive evidence of improved cortical or cognitive function without complementary neuropsychological or functional assessments. Mixed-design repeated-measures analysis demonstrated a significant effect of time (p < 0.001), indicating that cortical activity increased following rehabilitation, irrespective of prosthesis type. Although the tooth-supported overdenture with stud attachment group demonstrated the greatest numerical increase in brain activity, neither the overall group effect nor the group-by-time interaction was significant (p > 0.05). Pairwise intergroup comparisons at baseline and after two months also revealed no significant differences.

conclusionProsthodontic rehabilitation was associated with a significant increase in EEG-derived cortical brain activity after two months of functional use. Although attachment-retained tooth-supported overdentures showed the highest numerical increase, they were not statistically superior to the other treatment modalities. These findings suggest that restoration of masticatory function is associated with enhanced cortical electrical activity, irrespective of prosthesis design.

Indexed as

completedentulous mouthdentureelectroencephalographymasticationoverdenture

Identifiers

PMID42688820
PMCPMC13537088

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.