ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2026
Identifying an oculomotor phenotype for adolescent depression with an interleaved pro- and anti-saccade task.
Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Altered Saccades, Blink and Pupil Responses in Functional Motor Disorder: New Insight Into Neurobiological Mechanisms.European journal of neurology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Numerous studies have shown that adults with depression have distinct oculomotor alterations during saccade tasks, but whether similar alterations occur in adolescents is largely unknown. The purpose of the present study was to test if eye-tracking during a structured saccade task could distinguish a group of adolescents with depression from healthy controls. We hypothesized that, due to overlapping circuitry between depression pathology and the oculomotor system, adolescents with depression would show alterations in fixation, saccade, and pupil behaviour. Methods: 51 adolescents with depression and 66 age-matched healthy controls completed the Interleaved Pro- and Anti-Saccade Task (IPAST) and several self-reported questionnaires for psychiatric symptoms. Oculomotor outcomes included fixatioy -40n acquisition, fixation breaks, correct rate, saccadic reaction time, rate of correct express-latency pro-saccades, rate of express- and regular-latency anti-saccade errors, baseline pupil size, as well as pupil constriction and dilation sizes following task instruction. Results: In comparison to healthy controls, adolescents with depression displayed impairments acquiring fixation, made more fixation breaks in pro- and anti-saccade trials, more anti-saccade errors, more express-latency saccades overall, had a smaller pupil constriction in pro-saccade trials and had a smaller pupil dilation in pro- and anti-saccade trials. No differences were found for saccadic reaction time, rate of correct pro-saccades, rate of regular-latency anti-saccade errors, pupil constriction size during anti-saccade trials, or baseline pupil size. Limitations: Patients had psychiatric comorbidities and were using psychotropic medication. While this reflected clinical reality, these factors may have influenced oculomotor behaviour. Conclusions: Adolescents with depression had altered fixation, saccade, and pupil behaviour during IPAST. Given that many cases of adolescent depression remain undetected, accessible and objective screening approaches are highly needed. This oculomotor phenotype may be used in the development of such a screening tool to detect those at risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.