ArticleThe journal of advanced prosthodontics2026
From milling to printing: evaluating the applicability of zirconia in restorative dentistry.
Article in The journal of advanced prosthodontics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study compared the mechanical and optical properties of 3D-printed and milled zirconia, and evaluate the marginal and internal adaptation of crowns fabricated with 3Y-TZP and veneers fabricated with 5Y-TZP. MATERIALS AND
methodsNinety-two disc specimens and thirty-six monolithic restorations (crowns and laminate veneers) were fabricated using standardized CAD-CAM workflows. Biaxial flexural strength was measured, and optical properties were evaluated using the translucency parameter (TP), total transmittance (TT), and haze. Marginal and internal adaptations were assessed using a silicone replica technique.
resultsPrinted 3Y-TZP showed flexural strength comparable to milled zirconia (1211.4 ± 114.3 MPa vs. 1120.3 ± 93.3 MPa;
conclusion3D-printed zirconia showed flexural strength comparable to milled zirconia and demonstrated favorable adaptation in selected regions, although optical properties were lower.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.