Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42688757›Full record

ArticleJournal of frailty, sarcopenia and falls2026

Co-Production of A Culturally Tailored Sarcopenia Screening Programme for Older Adults in Luton, UK: A Mixed-Methods Feasibility Study Protocol.

Oluwakemi Odufuwa, Ivelina Tsocheva, Gurch Randhawa, Nishani Jeyapalan, David Hewson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of frailty, sarcopenia and falls, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Oluwakemi OdufuwaUniversity of Bedfordshire, Luton, United Kingdom.
Ivelina TsochevaUniversity of Bedfordshire, Luton, United Kingdom.
Gurch RandhawaUniversity of Bedfordshire, Luton, United Kingdom.
Nishani JeyapalanUniversity of Bedfordshire, Luton, United Kingdom.
David HewsonUniversity of Bedfordshire, Luton, United Kingdom.

Funding

Society for Pediatric & Perinatal Epidemiologic Research 25th Anniversary MeetingR13ES022142 · NIEHS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI CARMICHAEL, SUZAN L · 2012 to 2012
$6k
NIEHS NIH HHS R13 ES022142
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sarcopenia is an age-related skeletal muscle disorder associated with frailty, falls, hospitalisation and mortality. Despite its clinical and public health importance, there is currently no structured sarcopenia screening programme in the United Kingdom, and uptake of preventive health interventions is often lower among ethnic minority populations. This study aims to co-produce a culturally tailored sarcopenia screening programme for community-dwelling older adults in a multi-ethnic UK setting. The study follows the Medical Research Council framework for complex interventions and comprises four phases: a mixed-methods systematic review to explore cultural attitudes toward screening; qualitative focus groups with older adults, stakeholders and healthcare professionals; co-production workshops using the Behaviour Change Wheel to design the intervention; and a small-scale feasibility study. Screening will be conducted using the SARC-Calf tool. Feasibility outcomes include recruitment, retention, completion rates and acceptability, while secondary outcomes include prevalence of probable sarcopenia and referral uptake to an existing community exercise programme. This study will provide evidence on the feasibility and acceptability of a culturally tailored sarcopenia screening programme and inform future large-scale evaluations.

Indexed as

Co-productionEthnic minoritiesHealth inequalitiesSarcopeniaScreening

Identifiers

PMID42688757
PMCPMC13536987

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.