ArticleJournal of dental sciences2026
Graph neural network-based prediction of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality using periodontal site-level data from National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES).
Article in Journal of dental sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background/purpose: Periodontitis is a common chronic inflammatory disease linked to systemic conditions. We applied a graph convolutional network (GCN) to site-level periodontal data to predict all-cause and cardiovascular mortality from National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). Materials and methods: Adults aged ≥30 years with full-mouth periodontal exams and linked mortality data through December 31, 2019 were included. Periodontal probing depth and clinical loss of attachment were measured. Each chart was converted into a graph with 168 nodes and anatomically defined edges. Graph-level embeddings were combined with age and sex to predict mortality. Model performance was evaluated in an independent test set using receiver operating characteristic - area under the curve (ROC AUC) and precision-recall - area under the curve (PR AUC). Results: Among 9034 participants (1000 deaths), deceased individuals had significantly greater mean probing depth (1.71 ± 0.68 mm vs. 1.58 ± 0.66 mm) and loss of attachment (2.46 ± 1.34 mm vs. 1.86 ± 1.06 mm) than survivors (both Conclusion: A GCN applied to site-level periodontal data achieved strong discrimination in predicting mortality. This finding highlights the prognostic significance of periodontal health and demonstrates the potential of graph-based deep learning for modeling complex periodontal-systemic interactions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.