ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2026
Documented perioperative adverse events in paediatric anaesthesia in Mongolia: a first national baseline report.
Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Paediatric anaesthesia safety depends on reliable data regarding perioperative adverse events. However, many low- and middle-income countries lack integrated reporting systems, making it difficult to estimate risk, identify modifiable factors, or monitor safety improvement. Mongolia has developed paediatric anaesthesia services through national training and international collaboration; however, no national system currently exists for systematic reporting of paediatric anaesthesia-related adverse events. This study aimed to provide the first national baseline description of documented perioperative adverse events in paediatric anaesthesia in Mongolia. Methods: We conducted a multicentre retrospective chart review at the main tertiary paediatric hospital and five provincial hospitals providing paediatric surgical services in Mongolia. All paediatric anaesthetic procedures performed between 1 January 2018 and 31 December 2022 were eligible. Anaesthesia charts, recovery room records, intensive care records, and other relevant perioperative documents were manually reviewed. Documented adverse events were classified as cardiovascular, respiratory, neurological, or other perioperative events. Results were summarized descriptively at the record and event levels. Results: Across 60,546 paediatric anaesthetic procedures, 640 records contained documentation of at least one perioperative adverse event. After exclusion of three records with insufficient documentation, 637 records were included in the final analysis. These records included a total of 1,159 documented perioperative adverse events, corresponding to 19.1 documented events per 1,000 procedures. Cardiovascular events were the most frequently documented category ( Conclusions: This study provides the first national baseline report on documented perioperative adverse events in paediatric anaesthesia in Mongolia. Cardiovascular and respiratory events were the most frequently documented categories, while serious adverse events were uncommon. Because this study relied on retrospective review of routine clinical records, the findings should be interpreted as documented event rates rather than definitive estimates of true incidence. These baseline data support the development of a prospective national reporting system, standardized event definitions, targeted training, and system-level safety improvements in Mongolian paediatric anaesthesia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.