Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42688651›Full record

ArticleCyborg and bionic systems (Washington, D.C.)2026

Physics-Informed Neural Networks Meet Multimodal Large Language Models: Biomechanical Simulation in Aortic Aneurysm.

Shichao Zhu, Mieradilijiang Abudupataer, Yulin Wang, Hongqiang Zhang, Hao Lai, Kai Zhu, Yongxin Sun, Nan Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cyborg and bionic systems (Washington, D.C.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Shichao ZhuDepartment of Cardiac Surgery and Shanghai Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, P.R. China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5057-9434
Mieradilijiang AbudupataerDepartment of Cardiac Surgery and Shanghai Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, P.R. China.
Yulin WangDepartment of Cardiac Surgery and Shanghai Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, P.R. China.
Hongqiang ZhangDepartment of Cardiac Surgery and Shanghai Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, P.R. China.
Hao LaiDepartment of Cardiac Surgery and Shanghai Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, P.R. China.
Kai ZhuDepartment of Cardiac Surgery and Shanghai Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, P.R. China.
Yongxin SunDepartment of Cardiac Surgery and Shanghai Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, P.R. China.
Nan ChenDepartment of Cardiac Surgery and Shanghai Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, P.R. China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4299-6649

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Axial dissections of the thoracic artery are common causes of death in people diagnosed with aortic dissection; however, decisions to intervene on ascending thoracic aortic patients are determined by the size of the ascending thoracic aorta based on its diameter. Diameter-based criteria fail to take into consideration the biomechanical properties of the aorta as well as other characteristics of the patient, and finite element analysis (in determining aortic wall stresses) would ideally address the issues associated with today's diameter-based criteria. A novel computational solution, termed BioPINN-LM, integrates 2 computational methods for the rapid real-time prediction of aortic wall stress: a physics-informed neural network (PINN) trained with mechanical simulation data to predict wall stress and a multimodal large language model that uses output data from the PINN along with image-based geometry descriptors to provide interpretable risk assessments from both ends of the aorta. Comparison of the PINN to the reference database of finite element method results demonstrates that the PINN produces an average wall stress prediction error of 8.34 kPa (6.12% relative error) for a blood pressure of 120/80 mmHg, with an average prediction time of 0.83 s per geometry compared to 38.6 min for the traditional finite element method. The conversational component of BioPINN-LM achieves 87.4% agreement with board-certified specialist recommendations on a benchmark of 200 simulated clinical scenario vignettes. As a simulation-based proof of concept, these results suggest that integrating mechanistic simulations with language-based inquiry may complement biomechanical decision-making for ascending thoracic aortic aneurysms; clinical validation on real patient cohorts with longitudinal outcomes is deferred to future work.

Identifiers

PMID42688651
PMCPMC13534809

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.