Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42688616›Full record

ArticleCHEST pulmonary2026

The Growing Use of Copy-Paste and Its Impact on Creation and Propagation of Documentation Errors.

Ryan Grattan, Sarah T Florig, Tanuj Devra, Vishnu Mohan, Jeffrey A Gold

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CHEST pulmonary, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ryan GrattanDivision of Informatics, Clinical Epidemiology and Translational Data Science, OHSU, Portland, OR.
Sarah T FlorigDivision of Informatics, Clinical Epidemiology and Translational Data Science, OHSU, Portland, OR.
Tanuj DevraDivision of Informatics, Clinical Epidemiology and Translational Data Science, OHSU, Portland, OR.
Vishnu MohanDivision of Informatics, Clinical Epidemiology and Translational Data Science, OHSU, Portland, OR.
Jeffrey A GoldDivision of Informatics, Clinical Epidemiology and Translational Data Science, OHSU, Portland, OR.

Funding

TRAINING PROGRAM IN HEALTH INFORMATICST15LM007088 · NLM · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI WILLIAM R HERSH, Vishnu Mohan · 1992 to 2026
$23.4M
NLM NIH HHS T15 LM007088
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Electronic health records have introduced tools to improve administrative productivity, but they also pose challenges that may affect documentation accuracy and clinical decisions, especially in high-acuity patients. Research Question: What is the prevalence and evolution of copy-paste practices in daily progress notes within an ICU, and how do these practices influence the creation or propagation of documentation errors? Study Design and Methods: This retrospective cohort study analyzed progress notes written by residents and attendings in a medical ICU at a single academic center from 2017 to 2022, focusing on the use of copied content. A random sample of 180 resident notes was manually reviewed for clinical accuracy. Content sources and copy-related errors were examined for correlations with encounter characteristics and documentation burden. Results: At total of 60,127 notes were analyzed for composition trends. Over the study period, resident notes lengthened by 21%, with copied content increasing by 34% and direct and templated content decreasing by 52% and 9%, respectively. Attending note length increased by 2%, with no change in copied content. For residents, periods with more notes written per day correlated positively with note length, and proportion of templated and copied text but negatively correlated with direct text. Chart review of resident notes revealed copied text in all samples; one-half were from another author. A total of 521 documentation errors were identified, with errors of omission being the most common (61%), then commission (28%), and temporal errors (11%). Temporal errors correlated with elapsed stay and copied text. Interpretation: In our medical ICU, progress notes are getting longer, and longer notes are associated with increased use of passive documentation such as copied content. For residents, this behavior is exacerbated during times of increased documentation burden. Copied content introduces a mechanism for errors to be created and propagated, as evidenced by the documentation errors related to copy-paste identified in this study.

Indexed as

administration retrospective studiescopy-pastecritical carecross-sectional studiesdocumentationelectronic health recordshumans inpatients organization

Identifiers

PMID42688616
PMCPMC13534859

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.