ArticleJournal of dental sciences2026
Performance of large language models on image-based oral pathology questions from the Japanese National Dental Examination.
Article in Journal of dental sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background /purpose: Large language models (LLMs), such as Chat Generative Pre-trained Transformer (ChatGPT) and Gemini, have demonstrated promising capabilities for medical question-answering tasks. However, the diagnostic performance of LLMs in image-based oral pathologies remains largely unexplored. This study aimed to evaluate these capabilities using histopathological images obtained from the Japanese National Dental Examination. Materials and methods: This study aimed to evaluate and compare the diagnostic accuracy and agreement of three LLMs (ChatGPT-4o [ChatGPT], Gemini 1.5 Pro [Gemini], and Claude 3.5 Sonnet [Claude]) on pathology image-based questions from the Japanese National Dental Examination. Results: Gemini achieved the highest accuracy (61.4 %), followed by Claude (52.3 %), and ChatGPT (45.4 %). Gemini and ChatGPT exhibited significant differences Conclusion: LLMs demonstrated moderate diagnostic performance for image-based dental pathology questions, with Gemini demonstrating superior accuracy and consistency. Although promising decision support tools in education and clinical settings, LLMs still exhibit domain-specific limitations and require careful oversight. The integration of explainable artificial intelligence and real-world clinical validation is recommended for its safe and effective use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.