Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42688596›Full record

ArticleJournal of dental sciences2026

Performance of large language models on image-based oral pathology questions from the Japanese National Dental Examination.

Hikaru Watanabe, Osamu Uehara, Tetsuro Morikawa, Takayuki Kojima, Takayuki Suga, Akira Toyofuku, Satoshi Takada, Yoshihiro Abiko

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of dental sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Hikaru WatanabeDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Ohu University School of Dentistry, Fukushima, Japan.
Osamu UeharaDivision of Disease Control and Molecular Epidemiology, Department of Oral Growth and Development, School of Dentistry, Health Sciences University of Hokkaido, Hokkaido, Japan.
Tetsuro MorikawaDivision of Oral Medicine and Pathology, Department of Human Biology and Pathophysiology, School of Dentistry, Health Sciences University of Hokkaido, Hokkaido, Japan.
Takayuki KojimaDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Ohu University School of Dentistry, Fukushima, Japan.
Takayuki SugaDepartment of Psychosomatic Dentistry, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Institute of Science Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Akira ToyofukuDepartment of Psychosomatic Dentistry, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Institute of Science Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Satoshi TakadaDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Ohu University School of Dentistry, Fukushima, Japan.
Yoshihiro AbikoDivision of Oral Medicine and Pathology, Department of Human Biology and Pathophysiology, School of Dentistry, Health Sciences University of Hokkaido, Hokkaido, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background /purpose: Large language models (LLMs), such as Chat Generative Pre-trained Transformer (ChatGPT) and Gemini, have demonstrated promising capabilities for medical question-answering tasks. However, the diagnostic performance of LLMs in image-based oral pathologies remains largely unexplored. This study aimed to evaluate these capabilities using histopathological images obtained from the Japanese National Dental Examination. Materials and methods: This study aimed to evaluate and compare the diagnostic accuracy and agreement of three LLMs (ChatGPT-4o [ChatGPT], Gemini 1.5 Pro [Gemini], and Claude 3.5 Sonnet [Claude]) on pathology image-based questions from the Japanese National Dental Examination. Results: Gemini achieved the highest accuracy (61.4 %), followed by Claude (52.3 %), and ChatGPT (45.4 %). Gemini and ChatGPT exhibited significant differences Conclusion: LLMs demonstrated moderate diagnostic performance for image-based dental pathology questions, with Gemini demonstrating superior accuracy and consistency. Although promising decision support tools in education and clinical settings, LLMs still exhibit domain-specific limitations and require careful oversight. The integration of explainable artificial intelligence and real-world clinical validation is recommended for its safe and effective use.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceChat generative Pretrained Transformer (ChatGPT)Japanese national dental examinationLarge language models

Identifiers

PMID42688596
PMCPMC13536290

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.