ArticleFrontiers in immunology2026
Carbamazepine activates private self and viral reactive TCRs through a drug-permissive HLA-B cleft.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Carbamazepine (CBZ) can cause severe cutaneous adverse reactions, including Stevens-Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis, and is strongly associated with HLA risk alleles. However, HLA genotype alone incompletely predicts clinical risk. Adverse drug reactions depend on drug-peptide-HLA conformation, immuno-regulatory cell interactions and the presence of drug-specific TCR clonotypes in susceptible patients. An unresolved question is whether patients that develop a specific drug reaction harbor the same drug-specific TCR (public TCR) or generate patient unique TCRs (private TCR). Methods: To address this controversy we expressed four published CBZ-associated TCRs including two public and two private clonotypes, in TCR-null TG40 cells and tested activation using monoallelic 721.221 APCs expressing HLA-B*15:02, HLA-B*57:01, HLA-B*58:01, or HLA-B*58:01(TE→MA), as well as HLA-transgenic/MHC I-deficient murine splenic APCs. T-cell activation was quantified by PD-1, CD69, and 4-1BB, while LC-MS/MS immunopeptidomics/MAPPs was used to assess drug effects on the peptide repertoire. CBZ docking was applied to define drug-peptide-MHC-TCR interactions in a drug reactive peptide specific TCR. Results and discussion: Public TCRs showed no CBZ-dependent activation, whereas private TCRs displayed dose-dependent, HLA class I-dependent responses supported by HLA-B*15:02 and unexpectedly HLA-B*57:01, but not HLA-B*58:01. Amino acid substitutions to HLA-B*58:01 (T45-E46 to M45-A46) mapped drug presentation to restore CBZ responsiveness without altering HLA expression. CBZ did not detectably induce broad abacavir-like peptide motif alterations but amplified HIV Gag KF11 peptide-driven T cell activation in an allele- and mutation-dependent manner. Modeling predicted a candidate CBZ accessible region beneath the peptide near HLA Met67, HLA Tyr9, and a conserved CDR3α tyrosine providing a plausible structural rationale for allele and clonotype-dependent activation. These findings support a model in which CBZ potentiates binding of selected peptide-HLA-TCR interfaces governed by HLA cleft architecture and clonotype-level TCR sensitivity. This mechanism explains why HLA screening alone incompletely predicts CBZ-SJS/TEN risk and highlights peptide-HLA-TCR functional context as a potential determinant for improved risk assessment and mechanistic drug hypersensitivity testing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.