SynthesisFrontiers in immunology2026
Infection risk associated with talquetamab in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: a systematic review with meta-analysis of talquetamab monotherapy and descriptive analysis of combination therapy.
Synthesis in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Talquetamab, a first-in-class G protein-coupled receptor family C group 5 member D (GPRC5D) × CD3 bispecific antibody, demonstrates substantial clinical activity in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). However, immune dysfunction associated with advanced disease, extensive prior therapies, and bispecific antibody-mediated immune modulation may increase susceptibility to infections. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to characterize infection risk associated with talquetamab, with separate evaluation of monotherapy and combination therapy settings. Methods: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science Core Collection, and Cochrane Library databases were searched from inception to July 1, 2026. Studies reporting infection outcomes among RRMM patients treated with talquetamab-containing regimens were eligible. Outcomes included any-grade infections, grade ≥3 infections, infection-related mortality, reported pathogens, and preventive strategies when available. Because talquetamab monotherapy and combination regimens represent clinically distinct treatment strategies, quantitative analyses were restricted to monotherapy cohorts, whereas combination therapy studies were summarized descriptively. A random-effects model was used to estimate pooled infection incidence. Methodological quality was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Critical Appraisal Checklist for Case Series. Results: Six studies were included in the qualitative synthesis, including four talquetamab monotherapy cohorts and two talquetamab-based combination therapy cohorts. Quantitative meta-analysis included four monotherapy cohorts comprising 735 patients for any-grade infections and three cohorts comprising 584 patients for grade ≥3 infections. The pooled incidence of any-grade infections was 51% (95% CI, 34%-67%; I² = 94.2%), while the pooled incidence of grade ≥3 infections was 22% (95% CI, 17%-28%; I² = 59.6%). Given the limited number of available studies and substantial heterogeneity, these pooled estimates should be interpreted as exploratory and hypothesis-generating. Combination therapy cohorts, including talquetamab plus teclistamab and talquetamab-based regimens from MonumenTAL-3, demonstrated substantial infection burdens and were characterized descriptively rather than quantitatively. Infection-related mortality ranged from 0% to 3.2%. Frequently reported infections included viral infections (particularly SARS-CoV-2 and cytomegalovirus), bacterial pneumonia, and opportunistic infections such as Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia. Conclusions: Talquetamab monotherapy in heavily pretreated RRMM patients is associated with a clinically meaningful risk of infections, including severe infections. The substantial heterogeneity observed across studies likely reflects differences in patient characteristics, prior therapies, treatment settings, infection definitions, and supportive care strategies. Combination bispecific antibody regimens may represent a potentially higher infection burden requiring enhanced infection surveillance and preventive approaches. Further prospective studies are warranted to better define infection risk factors and optimal prevention and management strategies during talquetamab therapy. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD420261357352, identifier CRD420261357352.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.