ReviewFrontiers in psychology2026
A scoping review on social isolation in patients with intestinal stomas.
Review in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Systematically sort out the psychological experiences, influencing factors, and intervention measures of social isolation in patients with intestinal stomas, providing evidence-based support for subsequent research. Methods: Search for relevant studies on social isolation in patients with enterostomy in CNKI, Wanfang Database, VIP Database, China Biomedical Literature Database, PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library, and CINAHL database, with the search period from database inception to June 4, 2026. Two researchers screened, organized, and summarized the literature based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. Results: A total of 22 articles were included. The experiences mainly involved impaired social function, psychological distress, and a lack of support resources; influencing factors were divided into four aspects: demographic characteristics, disease factors, psychological factors, and family and social factors; intervention measures included narrative care, acceptance and commitment therapy, health education, and other content. Conclusion: The social isolation status of patients with intestinal stomas is influenced by multiple factors. In the future, localized assessment tools should be developed to accurately identify the level of social isolation, helping patients return to society as soon as possible.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.