ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Field epidemiology training in Tunisia: achievements and gaps.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: National health security depends on a trained field epidemiology workforce. This study evaluates the Tunisia Field Epidemiology Training Program (T-FETP) from its launch in 2018 through 2024, with a focus on workforce capacity, geographic coverage, and structural barriers to program sustainability. Methods: We conducted a descriptive cross-sectional analysis of the national T-FETP graduate roster. Territorial coverage was assessed against the international benchmark of one Intermediate-level FETP graduate per 200,000 inhabitants. Density and capacity gaps were analyzed for each of Tunisia's 24 governorates. Results: A total of 103 professionals were trained across seven cohorts, including 50 at the Intermediate level. While national density reached 0.83 per 200,000 inhabitants, it decreased to 0.57 when restricted to regional and local levels. Only 25% of governorates met the recommended threshold, and six had no Intermediate-level epidemiologist. The estimated cumulative national shortfall was 43 professionals. Marked geographic disparities were observed, with lower coverage in densely populated areas. Among graduates, 75.7% were female and 70.5% were physicians. In 2026, the median age of Intermediate graduates was 54 years. Conclusion: Expanding training output alone has not produced adequate or equitable field epidemiology capacity in Tunisia. Geographic disparities, limited institutionalization, and the absence of sustainable domestic financing remain key constraints. Addressing these gaps requires sustained training, needs-based deployment, and formal recognition of field epidemiology as a distinct professional role within the public health system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.